Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 1, 2025

Wang v. Hainan Hnat-Management LLC

Judge
Edgardo Ramos
Docket
1:24-cv-04251
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Wang v. Hainan Hnat-Management, Judge Ramos granted the parties’ request to extend their settlement-submission deadline to December 31, 2025.

Who this affects

The plaintiff and Hainan Hnat-Management (US) LLC, whose deadline to submit their settlement agreement was extended to December 31, 2025.

What happened

Wang v. Hainan Hnat-Management (US) LLC concerns a joint request for more time to submit a settlement agreement for court review. The defendant’s attorney said the parties were finalizing the agreement and obtaining funds for the settlement payment.

The parties asked to extend the deadline from November 26, 2025, to December 31, 2025. The request was made with the consent of the plaintiff’s attorney.

Judge Edgardo Ramos granted the request and set December 31, 2025, as the deadline to submit the settlement agreement.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Wang v. Hainan Hnat-Management LLC · No. 1:24-cv-04251
Judge
Edgardo Ramos
Date
Dec. 1, 2025

Background

The defendant’s attorney submitted a joint letter on November 26, 2025, with the plaintiff’s counsel’s consent. The letter concerned submitting the parties’ settlement agreement for court review under Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc. The letter stated that the defendant was obtaining funds for the settlement payment and that the parties were finalizing the settlement terms.

Request

The parties requested additional time to submit the settlement agreement, asking that the deadline be extended to December 31, 2025.

Ruling

The court granted the request. The order sets December 31, 2025, as the deadline to submit the settlement agreement. The opinion does not state whether the court approved the settlement itself.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.