Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 1, 2025

Roldan v. Bronx Pro Realty

Judge
Stewart Aaron
Docket
1:25-cv-05943
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
5
ADA / DisabilityCivil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Roldan v. Bronx Pro Realty, Magistrate Judge Aaron adjourned the conference and required a status update on Roldan’s accommodation request.

Who this affects

Brendalis Roldan, the self-represented plaintiff, must provide a status update about her disability-accommodation request by December 15, 2025. The scheduled conference was adjourned, and the pending motions will be decided on written submissions.

What happened

In Brendalis Roldan v. Bronx Pro Realty, et al., Roldan said she could not attend a December 2, 2025 telephone conference because she needed accommodations related to a disability. The court said she had not identified the accommodations she needed or provided required information about her disability.

The court also noted that Roldan had been communicating with a court representative about accommodations as of November 17, 2025. Roldan was representing herself and said she had repeatedly requested accommodations, including remote access, communication support, timing changes, and written communication alternatives.

Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron adjourned the December 2 conference without setting a new date and said the court would decide the pending motions based on the parties’ written submissions. The court ordered Roldan to file a letter about the status of her accommodation request by December 15, 2025.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Roldan v. Bronx Pro Realty · No. 1:25-cv-05943
Judge
Stewart Aaron
Date
Dec. 1, 2025

Background

The court received a letter from Brendalis Roldan that had been filed in another case. The letter stated that Roldan would not attend a telephone conference scheduled for December 2, 2025, because she required accommodations under the Americans with Disabilities Act. The court noted that the letter did not specify the accommodations she needed and did not include this case number or name the defendant in this case.

The court said Roldan had asserted that she had requested accommodations repeatedly since March 2025, but that she had not raised the accommodation issues with Magistrate Judge Aaron in this action. The court also noted that Roldan had been communicating with a court representative about accommodations as of November 17, 2025, but had not provided required information, including information about the nature of her disability.

Roldan’s Position

Roldan described herself as a self-represented plaintiff. In her letter, she asserted that proceeding without accommodations would violate her rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Constitution. She requested, among other things, an assigned federal disability-accommodations coordinator, a written accommodation determination, implementation of her requested accommodations, and confirmation that the conference would not proceed until the accommodations were addressed.

Court’s Action

Judge Stewart D. Aaron ordered that the December 2 telephone conference be adjourned without setting a new date. The court stated that it would decide the pending motions based on the parties’ written submissions. The court also ordered Roldan to file a letter about the status of her accommodation request no later than December 15, 2025.

This order addressed scheduling and the status of Roldan’s accommodation request. It did not decide the merits of the underlying claims or the pending motions.

The authoritative version

Read the full 5-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.