Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 1, 2025

DuBose v. C.O. Nedd Shield #20705

Full caption

Tyrek DuBose v. C.O. Nedd Shield #20705; CO John Doe#1, Shield # Unknown; CO Mayo Shield # Unknown; Nurse John Doe Shield # Unknown; Defendantco John Doe#2; Shield # Unknown

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-09650
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Tyrek DuBose v. C.O. Nedd, Judge Swain dismissed the duplicate civil-rights complaint without prejudice and did not charge its filing fee.

Who this affects

Tyrek DuBose’s duplicate lawsuit was dismissed without prejudice, while the opinion states that his earlier related case under docket number 25-CV-9072 remained pending. He was not charged the filing fee for this action, but permission to appeal without paying the filing fees was denied.

What happened

Tyrek DuBose filed a civil-rights lawsuit without a lawyer against C.O. Nedd and other defendants. The court said he had already filed a substantially similar or identical lawsuit against the same defendants, which was still pending under another docket number.

Because this case duplicated the pending lawsuit, the court dismissed the complaint without prejudice to that pending case. The court also directed the Clerk not to charge DuBose the $350 filing fee or take the money from his prison account for this lawsuit.

Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain also ruled that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without paying the filing fees.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
DuBose v. C.O. Nedd Shield #20705 · No. 1:25-cv-09650
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Dec. 1, 2025

Background

Tyrek DuBose, who the opinion says is incarcerated at the George R. Vierno Center on Rikers Island, filed this lawsuit without a lawyer under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims. It states that DuBose had already filed a substantially similar, if not identical, complaint against the same defendants in a prior related proceeding, docket number 25-CV-9072 (LTS), which was still pending.

Ruling

The court dismissed this complaint without prejudice as duplicative of docket number 25-CV-9072. The court explained that filing and litigating a duplicate lawsuit would serve no useful purpose. The dismissal was without prejudice to DuBose’s pending case.

Fees and Appeal

The court directed the Clerk of Court not to charge DuBose the $350 filing fee for this action. It also directed that the official responsible for his custody not deduct or encumber funds from his prison trust account for this lawsuit. Finally, the court certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without paying the filing fees.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.