Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 3, 2025

Drywall Tapers and Painters of Greater New York Local Union 1974 v. Magnitude…

Full caption

Drywall Tapers and Painters of Greater New York Local Union 1974, Affiliated with International Union of Allied Painters and Allied Trades, AFL-CIO v. Magnitude Drywall Taping

Judge
Ho
Docket
1:25-cv-09945
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
ArbitrationCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Drywall Tapers v. Magnitude Drywall Taping, Judge Ho set briefing and service deadlines for a petition to confirm an arbitration award.

Who this affects

The petitioner and Magnitude Drywall Taping, the respondent in the petition to confirm an arbitration award.

What happened

Drywall Tapers and Painters of Greater New York Local Union 1974 filed a petition asking the court to confirm an arbitration award. The opinion states that the petition was filed on December 1, 2026, although the order is dated December 3, 2025.

The court ordered the petitioner to serve the petition, supporting papers, and the order on Magnitude Drywall Taping under Rule 4 and file proof of service by December 10, 2025. The petitioner may submit additional supporting materials by January 7, 2026; any opposition is due January 28, 2026; and any reply is due February 4, 2026.

Judge Dale E. Ho explained that proceedings to confirm arbitration awards are handled similarly to summary-judgment motions, but he did not decide whether the award should be confirmed.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Drywall Tapers and Painters of Greater New York Local Union 1974 v. Magnitude… · No. 1:25-cv-09945
Judge
Ho
Date
Dec. 3, 2025

Background

The petitioner filed a petition to confirm an arbitration award. The opinion states that the petition was filed on December 1, 2026, while the order is dated December 3, 2025.

Court’s Directions

The court stated that proceedings to confirm an arbitration award are treated similarly to motions for summary judgment, which ask whether the record shows that a party is entitled to judgment without a trial. The court ordered the petitioner to file and serve any additional materials supporting the petition by January 7, 2026. Magnitude Drywall Taping’s opposition, if any, is due January 28, 2026, and the petitioner’s reply, if any, is due February 4, 2026.

The petitioner must serve the petition, all supporting papers, and the order on the respondent under Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. It must also file an affidavit showing that service was completed by December 10, 2025.

Disposition

This order sets service and briefing requirements; it does not rule on whether the arbitration award should be confirmed. Judge Dale E. Ho issued the order on December 3, 2025.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.