Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 5, 2025

Perry v. Weill Cornell Medical College

Judge
Rochon
Docket
1:25-cv-08504
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Caleb Perry v. Weill Cornell Medical College, Judge Rochon ordered Marshals service after Perry received permission to proceed without paying fees.

Who this affects

Caleb Perry, Weill Cornell Medical College, the Clerk of Court, and the U.S. Marshals Service.

What happened

Caleb Perry v. Weill Cornell Medical College concerns Perry’s claims that his employer discriminated against him because of his race and sex. He sued under federal and state civil-rights laws and is representing himself.

The court had already allowed Perry to proceed without paying court fees upfront. Because of that decision, Perry could rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendant.

Judge Jennifer L. Rochon ordered the Clerk of Court to issue a summons, prepare the service paperwork, and send the necessary documents to the Marshals Service. The order did not decide whether Perry’s discrimination claims were valid.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Perry v. Weill Cornell Medical College · No. 1:25-cv-08504
Judge
Rochon
Date
Dec. 5, 2025

Background

Caleb Perry, who is representing himself, sued Weill Cornell Medical College under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 1981, and the New York State and New York City Human Rights Laws. He alleges that his employer discriminated against him based on race and sex.

In an order dated December 4, 2025, the court granted Perry permission to proceed without prepaying filing fees. This status is commonly called proceeding in forma pauperis, or IFP.

Service of the Lawsuit

Because Perry was granted IFP status, the court said he could rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendant. The court explained that federal law requires the court to arrange service in IFP cases.

The court also extended the service deadline. Although the usual rule requires service within 90 days after filing the complaint, Perry could not have served the defendant until the court reviewed the complaint and ordered that a summons be issued. The deadline is therefore 90 days after the summons is issued.

Ruling

Judge Jennifer L. Rochon directed the Clerk of Court to issue a summons for Weill Cornell Medical College, complete the U.S. Marshals Service process form with the defendant’s address, and deliver the required documents to the Marshals Service. The Clerk was also directed to mail Perry an information package.

The court stated that Perry should request an extension if the complaint is not served within 90 days after the summons is issued. Perry must also notify the court in writing if his address changes, and the court may dismiss the action if he fails to do so. The order addressed service and related procedures; it did not decide the merits of Perry’s discrimination allegations.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.