Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
D. Minn.Procedural orderFiled May 18, 2026

Jensen v. College Town Pizza

Judge
Jeffrey Bryan
Docket
0:25-cv-03441
Court
U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureMotion to Dismiss
In one sentence

In Connor Jensen v. College Town Pizza, Judge Bryan dismissed the action without prejudice after finding no clear error in a recommendation based on failure to prosecute.

Who this affects

Connor Jensen’s action against College Town Pizza, Inc. was dismissed without prejudice after the court found that Jensen had failed to prosecute his claims.

What happened

Connor Jensen v. College Town Pizza, Inc. concerned a recommendation to dismiss Jensen’s case because he had not pursued his claims. Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright issued the recommendation, and neither side objected.

After the objection deadline passed, the court reviewed the recommendation for clear error and found none. It adopted the recommendation and dismissed the action without prejudice.

Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan entered the order on May 18, 2026. The order also directed that judgment be entered.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Jensen v. College Town Pizza · No. 0:25-cv-03441
Judge
Jeffrey M. Bryan
Date
May 18, 2026

Background

Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright recommended dismissing Connor Jensen’s action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) because Jensen had failed to prosecute his claims. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or explain the specific conduct that led to the recommendation.

Neither party objected to the recommendation, and the deadline for objections had passed. Without a timely objection, the court reviewed the recommendation for clear error, meaning an obvious mistake in the magistrate judge’s analysis.

Ruling

The court found no clear error, adopted the recommendation, and dismissed the action without prejudice. The order directed that judgment be entered accordingly.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.