Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 13, 2026

Nyambi v. Humboldt County Superior Court

Judge
Jacquelyn Corley
Docket
3:25-cv-03774
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
3
Civil ProcedureCivil RightsSection 1983Pro Se
In one sentence

In Tita Nyambi v. Humboldt County Superior Court, Judge Corley set April 15, 2026, as the deadline to file an amended complaint.

Who this affects

Tita Nyambi must file a sufficient amended complaint by April 15, 2026, or the claims may be dismissed.

What happened

Tita Nyambi v. Humboldt County Superior Court concerns a civil-rights lawsuit that Nyambi filed without a lawyer. The court had previously dismissed the complaint while allowing an amended complaint to be filed.

The court had difficulty delivering documents to Nyambi and had not received the required amended complaint. Although Nyambi later sent a letter describing arrests and jail placements, the court said the letter did not meet the requirements for an amended complaint.

Judge Jacquelyn Scott Corley gave Nyambi a new deadline of April 15, 2026, to file an amended complaint using the court’s form and including all claims to be pursued. The order warned that failing to file a sufficient amended complaint could result in dismissal of all claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Nyambi v. Humboldt County Superior Court · No. 3:25-cv-03774
Judge
Jacquelyn Corley
Date
Mar. 13, 2026

Background

Tita Nyambi filed this civil-rights case under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 while proceeding without an attorney. The court had previously dismissed the complaint but allowed Nyambi to amend it. The court also allowed Nyambi to proceed without paying filing fees in advance.

The court explained that documents mailed to the address and inmate number Nyambi had provided were returned as undeliverable. The Clerk later mailed the documents to another address, but those documents also were returned. Because Nyambi had not filed an amended complaint, the court issued an order requiring Nyambi either to provide a current mailing address and any necessary identification number or to explain why the case should not be dismissed without prejudice under Civil Local Rule 3-11.

Nyambi later sent a letter describing arrests and placement in and out of jail. The letter identified the Humboldt County Jail as a return address and provided another address for use when Nyambi was out of custody. Mail sent to the jail was not returned, suggesting that the address problem had been corrected at least temporarily. But Nyambi still had not filed an amended complaint.

Why the Letter Was Insufficient

The court said it was unclear whether Nyambi intended the December 29, 2025 letter to serve as an amended complaint. If that was the intention, the court found that the letter did not satisfy the prior order. The prior order required an amended complaint to use the court’s complaint form, include the caption and civil case number, and state the words “COURT-ORDERED FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT” on the first page. The letter did none of those things.

Order

Judge Jacquelyn Scott Corley set a new deadline of April 15, 2026, for Nyambi to file an amended complaint. The amended complaint must cure the problems described in the earlier dismissal order, use the court’s complaint form, include the required caption and case number, and contain the required title on its first page.

The court stated that an amended complaint completely replaces the original complaint. Nyambi therefore may not incorporate the original complaint by reference and must include every claim Nyambi wishes to pursue in the amended complaint. The court warned that failure to file an amended complaint by the deadline, or filing an insufficient amendment, may result in dismissal of all claims. This order set a filing deadline; it did not decide the merits of the civil-rights claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.