Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 10, 2026

Photonic Technologies Co., Ltd. v. Eliyan Corporation

Docket
5:26-cv-06389
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
4
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

Photonic Technologies v. Eliyan: the court granted the motion to seal confidential business and technical information.

Who this affects

Photonic Technologies Co., Ltd. may keep the identified highlighted portions of its complaint and Exhibits 1 through 8 under seal; the public will not have access to those portions through the public court filings.

What happened

In Photonic Technologies Co., Ltd. v. Eliyan Corporation, Photonic Technologies asked to seal highlighted portions of its complaint and eight attached exhibits. Eliyan Corporation did not respond to the request.

The court applied the standard requiring compelling reasons to keep records related to the claims from public view. It found that the materials contained confidential business and technical information whose release could harm Photonic Technologies and that the request was narrowly limited.

The court granted Photonic Technologies’ administrative motion to file under seal, ECF No. 2. The opinion was signed by the court on August 10, 2026.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Photonic Technologies Co., Ltd. v. Eliyan Corporation · No. 5:26-cv-06389
Date
Aug. 10, 2026

Background

Photonic Technologies filed an administrative motion to seal portions of its complaint and accompanying exhibits. The company described the material as confidential business documents, including a development agreement concerning commercially sensitive technologies. It argued that public disclosure could harm it. Eliyan Corporation did not file a response.

Legal standard

The court explained that judicial records generally are presumed open to public inspection. Because the sealing request concerned a complaint that was more than tangentially related to the underlying claims, Photonic Technologies had to show compelling reasons that outweighed the public’s interest in access. The court also applied the Northern District of California’s requirements that sealing requests identify the interests supporting secrecy, the injury from disclosure, why less restrictive alternatives would not work, and only seal material narrowly identified as sealable.

Ruling

The court found compelling reasons to seal confidential business and technical information whose disclosure could harm Photonic Technologies’ competitive standing. It also found the request narrowly tailored. The court granted the motion as to the identified highlighted portions of the complaint and Exhibits 1 through 8, describing those materials as confidential business and technical information whose release could harm Photonic Technologies. The order granted the administrative motion to file under seal, ECF No. 2.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.