Renesas Electronics Corporation v. Navitas Semiconductor USA
Renesas Electronics Corporation, et al. v. Navitas Semiconductor USA, Inc., et al.
- No
- 5:26-cv-07573
- U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
- 1
Counsel of record per CourtListener. Firm names are approximate and have been consolidated across spelling variants.
In Renesas Electronics Corporation v. Navitas Semiconductor USA, Inc., Judge Noél Wise denied Renesas’s administrative motion to seal filings as moot after its temporary restraining order motion became moot.
Renesas Electronics Corp. and Renesas Electronics America Inc., whose motion to seal was denied as moot; the clerk must keep ECF Nos. 16-3 through 16-28 under seal until further order.
What happened
Renesas Electronics Corporation v. Navitas Semiconductor USA, Inc. concerns an administrative motion by Renesas Electronics Corp. and Renesas Electronics America Inc. to seal parts of their brief and exhibits connected to a request for a temporary restraining order.
After the court entered the parties’ stipulation about preserving and disclosing information, the temporary restraining order motion became moot. Because the court did not consider the materials Renesas sought to seal, it denied the sealing motion as moot.
Judge Noél Wise ordered the clerk to keep filings ECF Nos. 16-3 through 16-28 under seal until the court issues a further order.
The detailed version
- Renesas Electronics Corporation v. Navitas Semiconductor USA · No. 5:26-cv-07573
- No
- Aug. 12, 2026
Background
In connection with their ex parte motion for a temporary restraining order, Renesas Electronics Corp. and Renesas Electronics America Inc. filed an administrative motion asking to seal portions of their brief and exhibits. The sealing request was docketed as ECF No. 16.
Court’s Ruling
After the court entered the parties’ stipulation concerning preservation and disclosure on August 10, 2026, the temporary restraining order motion became moot. The court stated that it had not considered the materials Renesas sought to seal. It therefore denied the administrative motion to file under seal as moot. The clerk must maintain ECF Nos. 16-3 through 16-28 under seal until further order of the court.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.