Li v. Douglas A. Collins
- Jesse Furman
- 1:25-cv-09765
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
Counsel of record per CourtListener. Firm names are approximate.
In Liuzhe Li v. Collins, Judge Furman dismissed the settled action without prejudice to reopening within 60 days if settlement fails.
Liuzhe Li and Douglas A. Collins, the parties to the action; the order also affects any pending motions and scheduled conferences in the case.
What happened
In Liuzhe Li v. Douglas A. Collins, the court was told that all claims had been settled in principle.
The court dismissed and discontinued the action without costs. The parties may ask to reopen it within 60 days if the settlement is not completed, but applications filed later may be denied.
Judge Jesse M. Furman also made pending motions moot, canceled conferences, and directed the Clerk to close the case. The parties must alert the court within three business days if the settlement requires judicial approval.
The detailed version
- Li v. Douglas A. Collins · No. 1:25-cv-09765
- Jesse Furman
- July 15, 2026
Background
The court was advised at ECF No. 19 that all claims in the action had been settled in principle. The opinion does not describe the claims or provide the settlement’s terms.
Ruling
The court ordered that the action be dismissed and discontinued without costs, and without prejudice to the parties’ right to reopen the action within 60 days of the order if the settlement is not completed. Any request to reopen had to be filed by that deadline; the court stated that a later request could be denied solely because it was late. The court also stated that requests to extend the reopening deadline were unlikely to be granted.
If the parties wanted the court to retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement, they had to submit the agreement by the reopening deadline for the court to approve by order. The court stated that, unless it ordered otherwise, it would not retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement unless the agreement became part of the public record.
The court further ordered that, if judicial approval of the settlement was required—for example, for a class action, a settlement involving an infant or incompetent person, or claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act—the parties had to notify the court within three business days of the order and propose a schedule for seeking approval. Any pending motions were declared moot, all conferences were canceled, and the Clerk of Court was directed to close the case.
Effect
The order ended the action based on the reported settlement in principle rather than deciding the underlying claims. The action could be reopened within the stated 60-day period if the settlement was not consummated. The order did not state whether the settlement was ultimately completed.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.