Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 16, 2026

Burns v. Mr. Kenneth Kauffman

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:26-cv-05705
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In George Burns v. Mr. Kenneth Kauffman, Judge Swain dismissed the action and certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

Who this affects

The dismissal affected George Burns’s action against Mr. Kenneth Kauffman, County Law 18B Lawyer. The opinion does not provide enough information to identify the underlying claims or explain the practical effect beyond dismissal.

What happened

George Burns sued Mr. Kenneth Kauffman, County Law 18B Lawyer, in the Southern District of New York. The judgment states that the action was dismissed for reasons given in a July 9, 2026, order.

The opinion provided here does not include the July 9 order, so it does not explain why the action was dismissed. It also does not state whether the dismissal was with or without prejudice.

Chief United States District Judge Laura Taylor Swain entered the judgment on July 16, 2026, and certified under federal law that any appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Burns v. Mr. Kenneth Kauffman · No. 1:26-cv-05705
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
July 16, 2026

Disposition

The court dismissed the action “[f]or the reasons stated in the July 9, 2026, order.” The July 9 order is not included in the provided opinion, so the basis for dismissal cannot be determined from this text. The judgment does not say whether the dismissal was with or without prejudice.

Appeal Certification

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the judgment would not be taken in good faith. The judgment cites Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444–45 (1962).

Judge and Date

Chief United States District Judge Laura Taylor Swain signed the judgment, which was dated July 16, 2026, in New York, New York.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.