Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 16, 2026

Frazier v. South Shore University Hospital

Full caption

Cinquetta M. Frazier v. South Shore University Hospital (Northwell Health); Hospital Administrators (John/Jane Does); Medical Staff (John/Jane Does); New York State Division of Human Rights; DHR Investigators (John/Jane Does)

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:26-cv-05829
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Cinquetta M. Frazier v. South Shore University Hospital, Judge Swain transferred the case to the Eastern District of New York for convenience.

Who this affects

The transfer affects Cinquetta M. Frazier and the defendants because the action will proceed, if allowed to continue, in the Eastern District of New York rather than the Southern District of New York. The transferee court will decide the fee-prepayment and motion-to-vacate issues identified in the order.

What happened

In Cinquetta M. Frazier v. South Shore University Hospital, Cinquetta M. Frazier, representing herself, sued the hospital, unidentified hospital administrators and medical staff, the New York State Division of Human Rights, and unidentified investigators. She brought claims under disability, civil-rights, and emergency-treatment laws and challenged events at the hospital and in later administrative proceedings.

Judge Swain explained that the complaint did not identify where the defendants lived, so it was unclear whether venue was proper in the Southern District of New York. But the medical treatment and other events primarily occurred in Suffolk County, where relevant witnesses and documents were expected to be located, making the Eastern District of New York a more convenient forum.

The court transferred the action to the Eastern District of New York under the federal venue-transfer statute. The transferee court will decide whether Frazier may proceed without prepaying fees and whether her motion to vacate the state agency decision should be granted. Judge Swain also stated that no summons would issue from her court, closed the case there, and denied fee-free status for any appeal.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Frazier v. South Shore University Hospital · No. 1:26-cv-05829
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
July 16, 2026

Background

Cinquetta M. Frazier, who was representing herself and provided an address in Macon, Georgia, filed an action against South Shore University Hospital (Northwell Health); unidentified hospital administrators; unidentified medical staff; the New York State Division of Human Rights; and unidentified DHR investigators. She asserted claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, and 1986, and the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act. She alleged violations connected to medical treatment at South Shore University Hospital in Bay Shore, Suffolk County, New York, and to later proceedings before the New York State Division of Human Rights. She also filed a motion to vacate a decision of that agency.

Venue

The court explained that federal venue may be proper where a defendant resides, where a substantial part of the events occurred, or, in some circumstances, where a defendant is subject to the court’s personal jurisdiction. The complaint did not state where any defendant resided, so the court could not determine whether venue was proper in the Southern District of New York under the residence-based provision.

The court concluded that, even assuming venue was proper in the Southern District, venue was also proper in the Eastern District of New York because the events giving rise to the claims occurred primarily at the hospital in Suffolk County. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), a court may transfer a case to another district where it could have been brought when doing so would serve the convenience of the parties and witnesses and the interests of justice.

Ruling

The court determined that transfer was appropriate. The underlying events occurred in Suffolk County, and the court found it reasonable to expect that relevant documents and witnesses would also be there. It therefore directed the Clerk of Court to transfer the action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a).

The Southern District of New York did not decide whether Frazier may proceed without prepaying filing fees or whether her motion to vacate should be granted; the transferee court will decide those matters. The court stated that a summons would not issue from the Southern District, that the order closed the case in that court, and that any appeal would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied fee-free status for purposes of an appeal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.