Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 17, 2026

Amari J. Moody v. Suwanee Ear, Nose & Throat, P.C., et al.

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:26-cv-01484
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

Amari J. Moody v. Suwanee Ear, Nose & Throat, Judge Swain dismissed the action and certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith.

Who this affects

The judgment dismissed Amari J. Moody’s action against Suwanee Ear, Nose & Throat, P.C., et al.; the provided text does not describe the claims or the dismissal’s effect on refiling.

What happened

In Amari J. Moody v. Suwanee Ear, Nose & Throat, P.C., et al., the court dismissed the action for the reasons stated in a July 13, 2026, order. This judgment does not describe those reasons.

The court also certified that any appeal from the judgment would not be taken in good faith.

Chief United States District Judge Laura Taylor Swain signed the judgment on July 17, 2026.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Amari J. Moody v. Suwanee Ear, Nose & Throat, P.C., et al. · No. 1:26-cv-01484
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
July 17, 2026

Ruling

The court dismissed the action. The judgment states that the dismissal was based on the reasons given in the court’s July 13, 2026, order, but that earlier order is not included in the provided text. The basis for dismissal therefore cannot be determined from this judgment alone.

Appeal certification

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), the court certified that any appeal from the judgment would not be taken in good faith. The judgment cites Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444–45 (1962).

Disposition

The action was dismissed. The provided judgment does not state whether the dismissal was with or without prejudice, and it does not describe the claims or explain the July 13 order’s reasoning.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.