Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 20, 2026

Sanchez v. Park Ave. Apartments LLC

Full caption

Diana Sanchez and Natalia Sanchez v. Park Ave. Apartments LLC, Moshe Piller, and Isaac Fried

Judge
Figueredo
Docket
1:23-cv-07081
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
FlsaEmploymentCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Sanchez v. Park Ave. Apartments, Judge Figueredo approved the settlement and discontinued the wage claims with prejudice and without costs.

Who this affects

The settlement affected Diana Sanchez and Natalia Sanchez, the defendants Park Ave. Apartments LLC, Moshe Piller, and Isaac Fried, and plaintiffs’ counsel. It ended the action while preserving the court’s authority to enforce the settlement.

What happened

Diana Sanchez and Natalia Sanchez sued Park Ave. Apartments LLC, Moshe Piller, and Isaac Fried under the Fair Labor Standards Act and New York Labor Law. The parties reached an agreement to resolve the case and asked the court to approve it.

The agreement provided for a $57,000 settlement fund. Plaintiffs’ counsel requested $19,249.13 in fees and costs, and the agreement also included a $3,000 offset connected to releasing claims concerning Diana Sanchez’s tenancy and a separate Housing Court case.

Judge Valerie Figueredo found the agreement fair, reasonable, and adequate, approved it, and retained jurisdiction to enforce it if necessary. The court discontinued the action with prejudice and without costs and directed the Clerk of Court to close the case, while allowing plaintiffs to seek restoration within 30 days if the written settlement documentation was not completed.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Sanchez v. Park Ave. Apartments LLC · No. 1:23-cv-07081
Judge
Figueredo
Date
July 20, 2026

Background

Diana Sanchez and Natalia Sanchez brought this action under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and New York Labor Law (NYLL). The parties consented to the court’s authority to decide the case. After reaching an agreement, they submitted a proposed amended settlement for court approval.

Settlement terms

The proposed agreement created a $57,000 settlement fund. Consistent with the plaintiffs’ retainer agreement, plaintiffs’ counsel requested $19,249.13 in attorneys’ fees and costs, an amount not greater than one-third of the settlement fund.

The agreement also included a $3,000 offset borne between Diana Sanchez and counsel. That provision was intended to secure a complete release of claims the defendants might have had arising from Diana Sanchez’s tenancy. The agreement released claims concerning the plaintiffs’ occupancy in buildings owned by the defendants and required the defendants to cancel and use their best efforts to terminate enforcement efforts related to a separate Housing Court action.

Court’s analysis

The court reviewed the agreement, the parties’ supporting letter, and other supporting materials. Applying the review required for FLSA settlements, the court considered whether the agreement was a reasonable compromise of the claims. The court found that the totality of the circumstances and the agreement’s terms showed that the settlement was fair, reasonable, and adequate both to address the plaintiffs’ claims and to compensate their counsel.

Ruling and disposition

The court approved the settlement agreement. It retained jurisdiction to enforce the agreement if necessary. As a result of the approval, the action was discontinued with prejudice and without costs. The order allowed the plaintiffs, within 30 days of the order’s date, to apply by letter to restore the action to the active calendar if any part of the written settlement documentation was not completed. The Clerk of Court was directed to close the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.