Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 20, 2026

Williams v. T-Mobile

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:26-cv-04522
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Clifton C. Williams v. T-Mobile, Chief Judge Swain transferred the data-breach case to Indiana after Williams did not respond.

Who this affects

Clifton C. Williams, T-Mobile, and Metro PCS; the action was transferred from the Southern District of New York to the Southern District of Indiana without a decision on the underlying claims.

What happened

Clifton C. Williams sued T-Mobile and Metro PCS, alleging that they allowed a data breach affecting his personal information and failed to tell him about it.

The court had previously warned that it might transfer the case because the alleged events occurred in Louisville, Kentucky, and Clarksville, Indiana, not in the Southern District of New York. Williams did not respond.

Chief Judge Swain transferred the case to the Southern District of Indiana under the federal venue statute. The court did not decide the underlying allegations, and it denied fee-free appeal status.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Williams v. T-Mobile · No. 1:26-cv-04522
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
July 20, 2026

Background

Clifton C. Williams, who is representing himself, brought this action against T-Mobile and Metro PCS. He alleges that the defendants permitted a data breach that affected his personal information and failed to notify him about the breach.

The alleged events occurred in Louisville, Kentucky, and more recently in Clarksville, Indiana. Williams did not allege that any events underlying his claim occurred in the Southern District of New York.

Transfer decision

In an earlier order, the court explained that it was considering transferring the case to the Southern District of Indiana, which includes Clarksville, under 28 U.S.C. § 1406. The court gave Williams 30 days to explain why the case should not be transferred and stated that it would transfer the case if he did not respond. Williams did not respond.

The court therefore directed the Clerk to transfer the action to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana. The order did not decide whether Williams's allegations against the defendants have merit. The transferee court will decide whether Williams may proceed without paying filing fees. No summons will issue from the Southern District of New York, and the order closes the case in that court.

Appeal-related ruling

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for an appeal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.