Court, Explained
U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
Back to docket
Procedural orderFiled Aug. 31, 2026

Miller v. 3c Care Systems LLC and Midwest Spine & Brain Institute

Full caption

Stacia Miller, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. 3c Care Systems LLC and Midwest Spine & Brain Institute, LLC; Elizabeth Williams, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. 3c Care Systems LLC and Midwest Spine & Brain Institute, LLC; Sammie Austin, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. 3c Care Systems LLC and Midwest Spine & Brain Institute, LLC; Gerald Jensen, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. 3c Care Systems LLC and Midwest Spine & Brain Institute, LLC

Judge
Dulce Foster
Docket
0:26-cv-03681
Court
U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
Pages
6
Civil ProcedureClass ActionCivil Rights
In one sentence

Judge Foster consolidated six related data breach lawsuits against 3c Care Systems LLC and Midwest Spine & Brain Institute, LLC into one case and appointed Raina C. Borrelli as interim lead class counsel.

Who this affects

Individuals whose data may have been compromised in an alleged breach involving 3c Care Systems LLC and Midwest Spine & Brain Institute, LLC, who are named plaintiffs or potential class members in any of the six consolidated lawsuits. Attorneys representing plaintiffs in these cases are also directly affected by the appointment of interim lead class counsel and the restrictions on independent action.

What happened

Six separate federal lawsuits — Miller, Williams, Austin, Jensen, Fink, and Voss v. 3c Care Systems LLC and Midwest Spine & Brain Institute, LLC — were filed by individuals suing on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, all arising from what appears to be a data breach involving the same defendants. Because all six cases share common questions of law and fact, the plaintiffs moved to consolidate them into a single action and to appoint interim lead counsel for the proposed class.

The court found that consolidation was appropriate under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42(a), which allows courts to combine cases sharing common legal and factual questions. The court determined that combining the cases would promote efficiency and avoid unnecessary duplication of effort and expense. The consolidated case will be captioned 'In re 3c Care & Midwest Spine Data Breach Litigation' and will proceed under case number 26-cv-3681. Any future cases arising from the same subject matter may also be folded into this consolidated action.

Magistrate Judge Dulce J. Foster granted the motion and set a briefing schedule: plaintiffs must file a consolidated class action complaint by October 15, 2026; defendants must answer or move to dismiss by November 30, 2026; and further response deadlines follow from there. The court also appointed attorney Raina C. Borrelli as Interim Lead Class Counsel, giving her broad authority to manage the litigation on behalf of the proposed class, including directing discovery, conducting settlement talks, and coordinating with other plaintiffs' attorneys.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Miller v. 3c Care Systems LLC and Midwest Spine & Brain Institute · No. 0:26-cv-03681
Judge
Dulce J. Foster
Date
Aug. 31, 2026

Background

Six separate putative class actions (lawsuits where named plaintiffs seek to represent a larger group of similarly situated people) were filed in the District of Minnesota against the same two defendants: 3c Care Systems LLC and Midwest Spine & Brain Institute, LLC. The named plaintiffs are Stacia Miller, Elizabeth Williams, Sammie Austin, Gerald Jensen, Terri Fink, and Doug Voss. The opinion does not describe the substantive allegations in detail, but the consolidated caption — 'In re 3c Care & Midwest Spine Data Breach Litigation' — indicates the cases involve a data breach.

Procedural Posture

Plaintiffs filed a Motion to Consolidate Related Actions and Appoint Interim Class Counsel (ECF No. 8) in the lead case, Miller v. 3c Care Systems LLC, No. 26-cv-3681. The motion was brought under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42(a), which permits a court to consolidate actions that involve common questions of law or fact. The opinion does not reflect any opposition from defendants.

Ruling

Magistrate Judge Dulce J. Foster granted the motion in full. The court found that all six cases involve common questions of law and fact and that consolidation would promote judicial efficiency and prevent duplicative work and expense by the parties, citing Adedipe v. U.S. Bank, Nat. Ass'n, 2014 WL 835174 (D. Minn. March 4, 2014).

Key Orders

Consolidation All six cases are consolidated under Case No. 26-cv-3681. The new unified caption is 'In re 3c Care & Midwest Spine Data Breach Litigation.' Any future actions arising from substantially the same subject matter that meet Rule 42(a) requirements will also be consolidated into this action.

Briefing Schedule The court set the following deadlines for the Consolidated Action: - October 15, 2026: Plaintiffs must file a Consolidated Class Action Complaint. - November 30, 2026: Defendants must file an answer or motion to dismiss. - January 14, 2027: If defendants move to dismiss, plaintiffs' opposition is due. - February 4, 2027: Defendants' reply in support of any motion to dismiss is due.

Appointment of Interim Lead Class Counsel Raina C. Borrelli is appointed as Interim Lead Class Counsel. Her enumerated responsibilities include: presenting the putative class's positions to the court and opposing parties; coordinating discovery; convening meetings among counsel; conducting settlement negotiations; delegating tasks to other plaintiffs' counsel; negotiating stipulations; monitoring compliance with schedules and litigation deadlines; ensuring billing and expense protocols are followed; serving as the primary contact between the court and other counsel; distributing notices and orders; communicating with defense counsel; and allocating any court-awarded attorneys' fees, costs, and expenses among plaintiffs' counsel.

All other plaintiffs' counsel involved in the Consolidated Action are prohibited from taking action on behalf of the putative class without advance authorization from Interim Lead Class Counsel, except to seek modification of or relief from this order.

Additional Directives The court ordered that communications of privileged information among plaintiffs' counsel shall not constitute a waiver of attorney-client privilege or work product protection, recognizing that inter-counsel cooperation is essential. All counsel are directed to cooperate with one another to promote efficient handling of pretrial proceedings. The order applies to any action filed in, transferred to, or remanded to this court that relates to the same subject matter.

The authoritative version

Read the full 6-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.