Concurrent Ventures, LLC, et al. v. Advanced Micro Devices Inc., et al.
- Jon Tigar
- 4:25-cv-09567
- U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
- 1
Counsel of record per CourtListener. Firm names are approximate and have been consolidated across spelling variants.
In Concurrent Ventures v. Advanced Micro Devices, Judge Tiga granted plaintiffs’ unopposed motion to amend infringement contentions for the ’767 patent.
The plaintiffs and defendants in this patent litigation; the ruling permits the plaintiffs to amend their infringement contentions concerning the ’767 Patent.
What happened
In Concurrent Ventures, LLC, et al. v. Advanced Micro Devices Inc., et al., the plaintiffs asked to amend their infringement contentions concerning U.S. Patent No. 9,529,767.
The court found good cause because the plaintiffs made the amendments at the defendants’ request, and the defendants confirmed that they did not oppose the motion.
Judge Tiga granted the motion to amend the infringement contentions.
The detailed version
- Concurrent Ventures, LLC, et al. v. Advanced Micro Devices Inc., et al. · No. 4:25-cv-09567
- Jon Tigar
- Sept. 8, 2026
Background
The plaintiffs moved to amend their infringement contentions concerning U.S. Patent No. 9,529,767, referred to as the ’767 Patent. The motion was unopposed.
Legal standard
Patent Local Rule 3-6 permits amendment of infringement or invalidity contentions only by court order or upon a timely showing of good cause. The court described good cause as requiring consideration of whether the moving party acted diligently and whether amendment would prejudice the opposing party.
Ruling
The court found good cause. The plaintiffs amended their infringement contentions at the defendants’ request, and the defendants confirmed that they did not oppose the proposed amendments. The court therefore granted the motion to amend the infringement contentions.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.