Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 19, 2026

Eliria Knox v. Trade With The Pros S LLC

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:26-cv-05356
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Eliria Knox v. Trade With The Pros S LLC, Judge Swain dismissed Knox’s complaint without prejudice because she neither paid filing fees nor requested a fee waiver.

Who this affects

Eliria Knox’s complaint was dismissed without prejudice after she did not pay the filing fees or submit the required application to proceed without paying them.

What happened

In Eliria Knox v. Trade With The Pros S LLC, the court had ordered Eliria Knox to either pay the fees required to file a civil case or submit a completed request to proceed without paying them.

Knox did neither within the required thirty days. The opinion does not address the underlying claims against Trade With The Pros S LLC.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain dismissed the complaint without prejudice, directed the clerk to enter judgment, and denied Knox permission to appeal without paying fees after finding that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Eliria Knox v. Trade With The Pros S LLC · No. 1:26-cv-05356
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Aug. 19, 2026

Background

By an order dated July 6, 2026, the court directed Eliria Knox, within thirty days, to either submit a completed application to proceed without paying filing fees or pay the fees required to file a civil action. The earlier order warned that failing to comply would result in dismissal of the complaint.

Ruling

Knox did not submit the application or pay the filing fees. The court therefore dismissed the complaint without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914 and 1915. “Without prejudice” means the order did not state that refiling the complaint was barred.

The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith, and denied permission to appeal without paying fees. The court directed the clerk to enter judgment. The order did not decide the merits of Knox’s claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.