Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 6, 2019

Napleton Orlando Imports, LLC v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.

Judge
Charles Breyer
Docket
3:16-cv-02086
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
2
Class ActionCivil ProcedureEvidence
In one sentence

In Napleton v. Volkswagen, Judge Breyer denied class-certification and expert-exclusion motions as moot and granted motions to seal related exhibits.

Who this affects

The dealers and the Bosch defendants, particularly regarding the class-certification and expert-exclusion motions and the exhibits containing technical and financial information.

What happened

Napleton Orlando Imports, LLC v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. involved dealership motions for class certification and to exclude an expert report submitted by the Bosch defendants. The court had issued a separate order granting the Bosch defendants’ motion for summary judgment on all claims brought by the named dealerships.

Because of that summary-judgment decision, the court did not consider the class-certification or expert-exclusion motions and denied both as moot. The court also reviewed requests to seal exhibits containing technical information about emissions software and financial information about the dealers.

The court granted the motions to seal, concluding that the parties’ interest in protecting that information outweighed the public’s right to access the exhibits under the circumstances. Judge Charles R. Breyer signed the order on December 6, 2019.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Napleton Orlando Imports, LLC v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. · No. 3:16-cv-02086
Judge
Charles Breyer
Date
Dec. 6, 2019

Background

This order concerns motions filed by the dealers and the Bosch defendants in multidistrict litigation involving Volkswagen “Clean Diesel” marketing, sales practices, and products-liability claims. In a separate order issued the same day, the court granted the Bosch defendants’ motion for summary judgment on all claims brought by the named-plaintiff dealerships.

Class Certification and Expert Testimony

In light of the summary-judgment ruling, the court denied as moot the dealers’ motion for class certification and their motion to exclude an expert report that the Bosch defendants had submitted in opposition to class certification. The court therefore did not consider either motion.

Motions to Seal

The dealers and the Bosch defendants asked the court to seal numerous exhibits filed with their briefing on class certification and the motion to exclude. Some exhibits contained technical details about the Bosch defendants’ emissions software, while others contained information about the dealers’ finances.

The court explained that, if it had considered the underlying motions, the parties’ confidentiality interests might not have outweighed the public’s right of access. Because the court did not consider those motions, however, the exhibits provided little insight into the judicial process. The court stated that the publicly available summary-judgment briefing, evidence, and order allowed the public to understand how the case was decided. Under those circumstances, the court found that the parties’ interest in protecting their technical and financial information outweighed the public’s right of access and granted the motions to seal.

Disposition

The court denied as moot the motion for class certification and the motion to exclude the expert report. It granted the parties’ motions to seal. The order was signed by United States District Judge Charles R. Breyer.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.