Green v. Robertson
- Lucy Koh
- 5:19-cv-08041
- U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
- 5
In Green v. Robertson, Judge Illman dismissed Green’s prison-rights complaint with leave to amend because it did not adequately connect the warden to unsafe bunk conditions.
Dameshlo A. Green, the state-prisoner plaintiff, was required to amend his complaint or face dismissal of the case. The order also affected the warden and any other prison officials Green might identify in an amended complaint.
What happened
In Dameshlo A. Green v. Jim Robertson, et al., a state prisoner sued under a federal civil-rights law after falling from a top bunk and injuring his hand. Green said he warned Pelican Bay State Prison administrators that the bunk lacked safety rails and requested a ladder or step, but received no response.
The court said Green needed to show that prison officials knew about and disregarded a serious risk to his safety. It also explained that a supervisor is generally liable only for the supervisor’s own involvement or wrongful failure to act, not merely because of the supervisor’s position. The court found that submitting a form to the warden, without more, did not sufficiently show the warden’s personal involvement or deliberate indifference.
The court dismissed the complaint with leave to amend and gave Green 28 days to file an amended complaint. The order was signed by Robert M. Illman, United States Magistrate Judge. Green was told to provide more information, including whether he requested a lower bunk and whether the failure to provide a ladder or step was sufficiently serious to violate the Eighth Amendment.
The detailed version
- Green v. Robertson · No. 5:19-cv-08041
- Lucy Koh
- Jan. 21, 2020
Background
Dameshlo A. Green, identified as a state prisoner, filed a complaint without a lawyer under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a federal law allowing claims against people acting under state authority for violating federal rights. The court had allowed him to proceed without paying the filing fee. Green alleged that he fell while climbing down from a top bunk and injured his hand. He said the bunk had no bars or safety rails, and that he had notified the administration of Pelican Bay State Prison about the danger and requested a wall ladder or step. He alleged that he submitted forms to the warden and the administration but received no response before he fell several weeks later.
Screening standard
Because Green was a prisoner suing government officials, the court was required to screen the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. The court had to identify claims that could proceed and dismiss claims that were frivolous, malicious, insufficiently pleaded, or sought money from an immune defendant. The court also applied the requirement that a complaint contain enough factual information to make a claim plausible, while construing a complaint filed without a lawyer liberally.
To state a § 1983 claim, Green had to allege both that a federal constitutional or statutory right was violated and that the violation was committed by someone acting under state authority. For an Eighth Amendment prison-safety claim, the alleged danger had to be objectively serious, and the official had to know about and disregard an excessive risk to the prisoner’s health or safety. Negligence or gross negligence was not enough. The court also explained that a supervisor could be liable for personal involvement or for a sufficient causal connection to the violation, including culpable conduct involving supervision, training, control, or acquiescence.
Court’s ruling
The court dismissed the complaint with leave to amend. It said the only named defendant was the warden, but Green had not shown the warden’s personal involvement in the alleged constitutional violation. Simply submitting a form to the warden, without additional facts, was insufficient to show deliberate indifference. The court said Green could consider naming officials who denied his requests for a ladder or step, and that he needed to explain whether he requested a lower bunk or provide more facts showing that the lack of a ladder or step was sufficiently serious and that the defendants had the required culpable state of mind.
Green was required to file an amended complaint within 28 days after the order was filed. The amended complaint had to use the caption and civil case number from the order and include all claims he wished to pursue; the court stated that failure to amend within the deadline would result in dismissal of the case. The order was signed by Robert M. Illman, United States Magistrate Judge.
Read the full 5-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.