Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 21, 2020

Simple Design Ltd. v. Candymobi Information Technology Co.

Judge
Vince Chhabria
Docket
3:19-cv-05501
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureIntellectual Property
In one sentence

In Simple Design v. Candymobi, Judge Chhabria ordered more briefing and evidence before deciding damages on Simple Design’s default-judgment motion.

Who this affects

Simple Design must provide additional briefing and evidence; the order concerns its motion for a default judgment against the defendants.

What happened

In Simple Design Ltd. v. Candymobi Information Technology Co., Simple Design asked the court to enter a default judgment. The opinion says the motion did not provide enough information to assess the amount of damages.

The court ordered Simple Design to file, within 14 days, a supplemental brief of no more than 10 pages and any relevant evidence supporting its damages calculation. If Simple Design seeks statutory damages, it must also address whether the allegedly infringing marks qualify as counterfeit marks.

The order did not state that the default-judgment motion was granted or denied. Judge Vince Chhabria instead ordered supplemental briefing on damages.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Simple Design Ltd. v. Candymobi Information Technology Co. · No. 3:19-cv-05501
Judge
Vince Chhabria
Date
Apr. 21, 2020

Background

Simple Design filed a motion for a default judgment. A default judgment is a judgment requested when a defendant has not defended the case. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or state whether a default had already been entered.

Court’s Analysis

The court held that Simple Design’s motion did not provide an adequate basis for assessing damages. The order specifically required additional support for the damages calculation. It also stated that, if Simple Design seeks statutory damages—damages set by statute rather than calculated solely from proven losses—the supplemental brief must address whether the alleged infringing marks qualify as counterfeits.

Order

Within 14 days, Simple Design was ordered to file a supplemental brief of no more than 10 pages and any relevant evidence supporting its damages calculation. The order did not grant or deny the motion for a default judgment and did not state the amount of any damages. Judge Vince Chhabria signed the order on April 21, 2020.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.