Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled May 8, 2020

Balzarini v. Lizarraga

Judge
Richard Seeborg
Docket
3:19-cv-07661
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
3
Civil ProcedureCivil Rights
In one sentence

Balzarini v. Lizarraga was dismissed without prejudice and the filing-fee waiver was denied under the three-strikes rule; Judge Seeborg entered judgment for defendant.

Who this affects

Michael Balzarini’s ability to proceed without prepaying the filing fee; he may bring the claims in a new paid complaint. The defendant received judgment in the closed action.

What happened

In Balzarini v. Lizarraga, a state prisoner brought a civil-rights case and asked to proceed without paying the filing fee. The court identified at least three earlier federal cases that counted as strikes under the law.

The court had ordered Balzarini to explain why the three-strikes restriction should not apply, but he did not respond. He also did not pay the filing fee or show that he faced an immediate danger of serious physical injury.

Judge Richard Seeborg denied the request to proceed without paying the fee and dismissed the action without prejudice, allowing Balzarini to bring his claims in a new paid complaint. The court entered judgment for the defendant and closed the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Balzarini v. Lizarraga · No. 3:19-cv-07661
Judge
Richard Seeborg
Date
May 8, 2020

Background

Michael Balzarini, a state prisoner, filed a federal civil-rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and applied to proceed in forma pauperis, meaning without prepaying the filing fee. The court identified at least three earlier federal actions that appeared to qualify as “strikes” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The opinion lists four prior actions and states that the Ninth Circuit had determined that the first three were strikes.

The court issued an order requiring Balzarini to show why the three-strikes restriction should not apply. That order also told him that he could avoid dismissal by paying the filing fee by the deadline.

Court’s Analysis

Balzarini did not respond to the show-cause order. The court found that he had not paid the filing fee, shown that any of the prior dismissals did not qualify as strikes, shown that he was under imminent danger of serious physical injury, or otherwise explained why the case should not be dismissed.

Section 1915(g) generally bars a prisoner from proceeding without prepaying the filing fee after three qualifying prior actions or appeals, unless the prisoner faces imminent danger of serious physical injury. Because Balzarini did not establish an exception or otherwise respond to the court’s order, the court denied his application to proceed without paying the fee.

Disposition

The court dismissed the civil-rights action without prejudice to Balzarini bringing his claims in a new paid complaint. It denied the application to proceed without prepaying the filing fee, entered judgment in favor of the defendant, terminated the pending motions, and closed the file. Judge Richard Seeborg signed the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.