Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled July 21, 2020

Kristy v. Costco Wholesale Corporation

Judge
Susan Van Keulen
Docket
5:20-cv-04119
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureMotion to Dismiss
In one sentence

In Kristy v. Costco, Judge Van Keulen denied as moot Costco’s motion to dismiss and judicial-notice requests after Kristy amended the complaint.

Who this affects

Anthony Kristy and Costco Wholesale Corporation; the order resolved Costco’s pending motion and requests without deciding the merits of the claims.

What happened

In Kristy v. Costco Wholesale Corporation, Costco moved to dismiss Anthony Kristy’s complaint under a federal rule allowing dismissal for failure to state a claim. Costco also asked the court to take judicial notice of certain materials.

Before the court ruled on those filings, Kristy filed a first amended complaint, which was permitted under the federal rules. The amendment made the pending motion to dismiss and requests for judicial notice moot.

Judge Susan Van Keulen denied Costco’s motion to dismiss and requests for judicial notice as moot. The judge also canceled the scheduled hearing.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Kristy v. Costco Wholesale Corporation · No. 5:20-cv-04119
Judge
Susan Van Keulen
Date
July 21, 2020

Background

Costco Wholesale Corporation moved to dismiss Anthony Kristy’s complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), which concerns whether a complaint states a legally sufficient claim. Costco also filed requests for judicial notice, asking the court to recognize certain materials without requiring formal proof of them.

Subsequent Filing

Kristy filed a first amended complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(1)(B). Because the original complaint had been amended, the pending motion to dismiss and requests for judicial notice no longer addressed the operative pleading.

Ruling

Judge Susan Van Keulen denied as moot Costco’s motion to dismiss and requests for judicial notice. The court also vacated the hearing scheduled for August 2020 at 10:00 a.m. The order did not decide whether Kristy’s claims were legally sufficient.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.