Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled July 29, 2020

Board of Trustees of the Laborers Health and Welfare Trust Fund for Northern…

Full caption

Board of Trustees of the Laborers Health and Welfare Trust Fund for Northern California v. Loza

Judge
Haywood Gilliam
Docket
4:17-cv-06474
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
3
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

Board of Trustees v. Loza: Judge Gilliam dismissed the case without prejudice after settlement, retaining jurisdiction to enforce the agreement.

Who this affects

The four plaintiff trust-fund boards and Juan Manuel Loza, doing business as Loza & Sons Construction.

What happened

Board of Trustees of the Laborers Health and Welfare Trust Fund for Northern California v. Loza involved four trust-fund boards as plaintiffs and Juan Manuel Loza, doing business as Loza & Sons Construction, as defendant. The parties jointly submitted a settlement agreement and asked the court to dismiss the case.

The court dismissed the matter without prejudice and retained jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement if enforcement became necessary after dismissal. The order did not decide the underlying dispute.

Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. entered the order on July 29, 2020.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Board of Trustees of the Laborers Health and Welfare Trust Fund for Northern… · No. 4:17-cv-06474
Judge
Haywood Gilliam
Date
July 29, 2020

Background

Four laborers trust-fund boards sued Juan Manuel Loza, an individual doing business as Loza & Sons Construction. The opinion text does not describe the underlying claims or dispute. The parties later entered into a settlement agreement and submitted a joint stipulation asking the court to dismiss the action.

Ruling

The court ordered that the matter be dismissed without prejudice. It also expressly retained jurisdiction—the court’s authority over the matter—to enforce the settlement agreement if enforcement became necessary after dismissal.

Result

Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. approved the parties’ stipulation and entered the dismissal order. The court did not reach or decide the merits of the underlying claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.