Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 4, 2020

Holman

Judge
Yvonne Rogers
Docket
4:20-cv-03083
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
1
HabeasCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In re Holman: Judge Rogers dismissed Roylund Kane Holman’s action without prejudice after he failed to submit required forms or pay the fee.

Who this affects

Roylund Kane Holman’s action was dismissed without prejudice, and the court directed the Clerk to close the file.

What happened

In re ROYLUND KANE HOLMAN involved a letter from Roylund Kane Holman that the court opened as a petition challenging his custody.

The court required him to file a completed petition form and either pay the filing fee or submit a completed application to proceed without paying it. He did neither within 28 days, so the court dismissed the action without prejudice and closed the file.

Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers issued the dismissal on August 4, 2020.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Holman · No. 4:20-cv-03083
Judge
Yvonne Rogers
Date
Aug. 4, 2020

Background

Roylund Kane Holman, who was in custody at the San Francisco County Jail, sent a letter to the court on May 5, 2020. The court opened the matter as a habeas action, meaning a case seeking judicial review of a person’s custody.

Required filings

The Clerk of Court notified Holman that the action could not proceed unless he filed a fully completed petition form within 28 days. The Clerk also directed him either to pay the filing fee or to submit a completed prisoner application to proceed without prepaying the fee.

More than 28 days passed, and Holman had not filed the completed petition form, paid the filing fee, or submitted the required application.

Ruling

Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers ordered that the action be dismissed without prejudice. The court directed the Clerk to close the file. The opinion does not address the underlying basis for Holman’s custody or the merits of any claim.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.