Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 21, 2020

Murphy, Esq. v. Hershey Chocolate Corporation

Judge
Phyllis Hamilton
Docket
4:20-cv-05895
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Murphy v. Hershey Chocolate Corporation, Magistrate Judge Claire transferred the case to the Northern District of California because venue appeared improper.

Who this affects

Shannon O. Murphy, Esq. Sr. and Hershey Chocolate Corporation; the case was moved from the Eastern District of California to the Northern District of California.

What happened

Shannon O. Murphy, Esq. Sr., who was representing himself, asked to proceed without paying the filing fee. His complaint appeared to allege injury from eating Hershey’s chocolate, and he stated that he lived in Pittsburgh, California.

The Eastern District of California ordered Murphy to explain why the case should not be transferred to the Northern District of California. Murphy did not respond. Based on the allegations, the court concluded that the case should have been filed in the Northern District.

Magistrate Judge Allison Claire ordered that the case be transferred to the Northern District of California. The order did not decide whether Murphy’s underlying injury claim was valid.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Murphy, Esq. v. Hershey Chocolate Corporation · No. 4:20-cv-05895
Judge
Phyllis Hamilton
Date
Aug. 21, 2020

Background

Shannon O. Murphy, Esq. Sr. filed a civil action against Hershey Chocolate Corporation and applied to proceed without paying the filing fee under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. The opinion states that Murphy was proceeding without a lawyer. The complaint appeared to allege that he was injured by ingesting Hershey’s chocolate. It stated that Murphy resided in Pittsburgh, California, but did not allege where Hershey resided.

Venue issue

Federal venue rules generally allow a civil action to proceed in a district where a defendant resides, where a substantial part of the events occurred, or, if no other district is available, where a defendant is subject to the court’s personal jurisdiction. The Eastern District of California issued an order directing Murphy to explain why the case should not be transferred to the Northern District of California. Murphy did not respond.

Ruling

The court determined from the complaint’s allegations that the case should have been filed in the Northern District of California. Citing the federal transfer statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a), the court ordered that the matter be transferred there in the interest of justice. Magistrate Judge Allison Claire did not decide the merits of Murphy’s underlying injury claim.

Disposition

The matter was transferred to the Northern District of California.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.