Hernandez v. Dutton Ranch Corporation
- Edward Chen
- 3:19-cv-00817
- U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
- 2
In Hernandez v. Dutton Ranch Corporation, Magistrate Judge Beeler ordered production of worker contact information and pay records under a protective order.
The order directly affected the two named plaintiffs, Dutton Ranch, and employees in the PAGA group whose contact information and pay records were sought. It also imposed an obligation on plaintiffs’ counsel to tell employees that they could decline contact.
What happened
Hernandez v. Dutton Ranch Corporation involves two migrant farmworker plaintiffs who harvested grapes and apples for Dutton Ranch and sued over alleged wage-and-hour violations, including a claim under California’s Private Attorneys General Act.
The plaintiffs sought contact information for the group covered by their PAGA claim, along with employee pay records and information about management staff. Dutton Ranch opposed producing the contact information without a notice giving employees a chance to refuse contact from plaintiffs’ lawyers.
Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler ordered Dutton Ranch to produce the requested contact information under the parties’ protective order and to produce the pay records and management information. She also required plaintiffs’ counsel to tell employees that they did not have to speak with counsel.
The detailed version
- Hernandez v. Dutton Ranch Corporation · No. 3:19-cv-00817
- Edward Chen
- Aug. 21, 2020
Background
The two named plaintiffs are migrant farmworkers who harvested grapes and apples for Dutton Ranch. They sued Dutton Ranch and other defendants over alleged wage-and-hour violations, including a claim under California’s Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA). The discovery dispute concerned information about employees who were part of the PAGA group.
The plaintiffs requested the group’s contact information and employee pay records. They asked to receive the information subject to a protective order, which limits how discovery materials may be used or disclosed. Dutton Ranch instead asked the court to require a Belaire notice. Such a notice would inform employees about the lawsuit and give them an opportunity to opt out of having plaintiffs’ counsel contact them.
Court’s Analysis
The court said that courts in the Northern District of California routinely allow discovery of putative group members’ confidential contact information before certification, subject to a protective order and without requiring a Belaire notice. The court ordered Dutton Ranch to produce the requested contact information under the parties’ protective order.
The court also held that Dutton Ranch must produce employee pay records and information about management staff because the plaintiffs’ requests were relevant to their wage-and-hour claims. The court required plaintiffs’ counsel to inform employees that they did not have to speak with counsel and that, if they chose not to do so, counsel would end the contact and not contact them again.
Ruling
Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler issued a discovery order requiring production of the contact information, pay records, and management information. The plaintiffs had requested production within seven days; the court stated that, if seven days was not reasonable for Dutton Ranch, the parties had to confer within seven days and propose a schedule to the court. The court decided the issue without oral argument.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.