National Urban League v. Ross
- Lucy Koh
- 5:20-cv-05799
- U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
- 7
In National Urban League v. Ross, Judge Koh granted a temporary restraining order blocking the Census Replan until the September 17 hearing.
The order directly affected Commerce Secretary Wilbur L. Ross, Jr., the U.S. Department of Commerce, Census Bureau Director Steven Dillingham, and the U.S. Census Bureau by restricting implementation of the August 3 Replan and changes to census field operations until the September 17 hearing. It also protected the interests asserted by the plaintiffs concerning census accuracy, representation, funding, and government services.
What happened
In National Urban League v. Ross, the plaintiffs challenged an August 3, 2020 plan that shortened census data-collection and processing timelines from eight months to four months. They argued that the shorter schedule could make census data less accurate and harm political representation, funding, and government services.
The court found serious questions about whether the plan violated the Administrative Procedure Act, including whether the plan was reviewable and whether it was arbitrary and capricious. The court also found potential irreparable harm, concluded that the hardships strongly favored the plaintiffs, and determined that accurate census data served the public interest. The court emphasized that it was not deciding the ultimate merits of the claims.
Judge Koh granted the plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary restraining order. The order barred the Commerce Secretary, the Department of Commerce, the Census Bureau’s director, and the Census Bureau from implementing the August 3 Replan or changing census field operations because of its shortened timelines until the September 17 hearing on the plaintiffs’ request for a preliminary injunction.
The detailed version
- National Urban League v. Ross · No. 5:20-cv-05799
- Lucy Koh
- Sept. 5, 2020
Background
The plaintiffs—including organizations, local governments, tribal entities, and individual plaintiffs—sued Commerce Secretary Wilbur L. Ross, Jr., the U.S. Department of Commerce, Census Bureau Director Steven Dillingham, and the U.S. Census Bureau. They alleged violations of the Enumeration Clause and the Administrative Procedure Act.
The plaintiffs asked for a temporary restraining order, or TRO, preventing the defendants from implementing an August 3, 2020 “Replan.” The Replan shortened the census data-collection and processing schedule from the eight months set out in the defendants’ April 13, 2020 COVID-19 Plan to four months. The plaintiffs argued that the shorter schedule would reduce the accuracy of census data. They requested that the TRO remain in effect until the September 17 hearing on their motion for a stay and preliminary injunction.
Court’s Analysis
A TRO is temporary relief intended to preserve the existing situation and prevent irreparable harm until a hearing. The court applied the factors used for preliminary injunctive relief: serious questions about the merits, likely irreparable harm, the balance of hardships, and the public interest.
The court found serious questions concerning the plaintiffs’ Administrative Procedure Act claims. These included whether the Replan was reviewable, whether the plaintiffs had standing, whether the Replan was final agency action, whether the decision was committed to agency discretion, and whether the Replan was arbitrary and capricious. The court said it was not prejudging those claims.
The court found that the plaintiffs had identified and supported four potential forms of irreparable harm: loss of political representation from an inaccurate apportionment, possible loss of federal funding, resources spent addressing undercounting, and increased local-government costs for services and capital allocation. Because an inaccurate decennial census count would not be remedied for another decade, the court concluded that these harms could last for that period.
The court also found that the defendants would face less burden from an injunction at that time than later in September. The defendants’ evidence indicated that field staff were already being terminated as operations wound down and that rehiring them later would be difficult. The court further considered statements indicating that the Census Bureau had passed the point at which it could produce accurate counts by December 31, 2020. It concluded that the balance of hardships and the public interest strongly favored the plaintiffs.
Ruling
The court GRANTED the plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary restraining order and found that no security was necessary. Effective September 5, 2020, the order enjoined Commerce Secretary Wilbur L. Ross, Jr., the U.S. Department of Commerce, Census Bureau Director Steven Dillingham, and the U.S. Census Bureau from implementing the August 3 Replan or allowing actions based on its shortened timelines, including winding down or altering census field operations. The injunction remained in effect until the court’s September 17 hearing on the plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction.
Judge Lucy M. Koh did not make a final ruling on the merits of the plaintiffs’ claims in this TRO order.
Read the full 7-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.