Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 104.15.67.119
- Joseph Spero
- 3:20-cv-07422
- U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
- 2
In Strike 3 Holdings v. John Doe, Chief Magistrate Judge Spero authorized subpoenas to identify the defendant, with notice and time to challenge.
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC, the unidentified defendant associated with IP address 104.15.67.119, AT&T U-Verse, any other identified internet service provider, and subscribers whose identifying information is sought.
What happened
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC asked the Northern District of California for permission to issue a subpoena before the parties’ required case-planning conference. The subpoena sought the name and address of the person assigned the listed internet address.
The court found good cause and authorized Strike 3 to subpoena AT&T U-Verse and any other internet provider identified in response. The providers must notify affected subscribers, who may challenge or seek to change the subpoenas within 30 days.
The order also required providers to preserve the information and limited its use to protecting Strike 3’s rights under the Copyright Act. Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero issued the order on November 16, 2020.
The detailed version
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 104.15.67.119 · No. 3:20-cv-07422
- Joseph Spero
- Nov. 16, 2020
Background
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC sought permission to serve a third-party subpoena before the parties held the conference normally required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f). The requested subpoena was directed to AT&T U-Verse and sought the true name and address of the defendant associated with IP address 104.15.67.119.
Ruling
The court found that Strike 3 had shown “good cause” to issue the subpoena. It authorized Strike 3 to serve AT&T with a subpoena under Rule 45 seeking the defendant’s identifying information. It also authorized subpoenas to any other internet service provider identified in response as providing internet service to the defendant.
The order stated that the authorized subpoenas qualify as court orders permitting disclosure under 47 U.S.C. § 551. Each provider must serve the affected subscriber with the subpoena and this order within 30 days after service on the provider. The subscriber or provider then has 30 days after service to file a motion contesting the subpoena, including a motion to cancel or modify it. If that period expires without a challenge, the provider has 10 days to produce the responsive information.
The providers must preserve the subpoenaed information while awaiting production or resolution of a timely motion to cancel the subpoena. Any information disclosed may be used only to protect Strike 3’s rights under the Copyright Act. The order further requires that the name or other personal identifying information of any current or proposed defendant, or any other subscriber identified through a subpoena, be filed under seal and not otherwise disclosed. Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero issued the order.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.