Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 30, 2020

Strike 3 Holdings v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 108.201.185.183

Full caption

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 108.201.185.183

Judge
Kandis Westmore
Docket
4:20-cv-07485
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
3
DiscoveryCivil ProcedureIntellectual Property
In one sentence

In Strike 3 Holdings v. John Doe, Judge Westmore allowed subpoenas seeking the subscriber’s identity for the copyright case.

Who this affects

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC may seek the identity and address of John Doe Subscriber Assigned IP Address 108.201.185.183 from AT&T Internet Services and any later-identified internet service providers. The affected subscriber and each provider may challenge a subpoena within the specified 30-day period.

What happened

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC sued John Doe Subscriber Assigned IP Address 108.201.185.183 and asked to identify the person connected to that internet address.

The court found good cause for Strike 3 Holdings to serve AT&T Internet Services with a subpoena before the parties’ required early conference. The subpoena may seek only the defendant’s true name and address, and may also be sent to later-identified internet providers.

Judge Kandis Westmore required notice to the affected subscribers, gave the subscribers and providers 30 days to challenge a subpoena, required providers to preserve the information, limited its use to protecting copyright rights, and required filings containing identifying information to be sealed.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Strike 3 Holdings v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 108.201.185.183 · No. 4:20-cv-07485
Judge
Kandis Westmore
Date
Nov. 30, 2020

Background

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC asked for permission to serve a third-party subpoena before the parties held the conference required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f). The subpoena was directed initially to AT&T Internet Services, identified in the order as the “Initial ISP Provider,” and sought information identifying the defendant associated with IP address 108.201.185.183.

Ruling

The court found that Strike 3 Holdings had shown good cause to serve the subpoena. The court authorized Strike 3 Holdings to serve AT&T Internet Services with a subpoena under Rule 45 seeking only the defendant’s true name and address. A copy of the order must accompany the subpoena.

The court also authorized Strike 3 Holdings to serve the same type of subpoena on any other internet service provider identified in response to a subpoena as providing internet service to the defendant. The order treated the authorized subpoenas as court orders permitting disclosure under 47 U.S.C. § 551, subject to the statute’s notice requirement.

Notice and challenges

Each internet service provider must notify each subscriber whose identifying information is sought within 30 days after being served. The subscriber and the provider each have 30 days after service to file a motion contesting the subpoena, including a motion to quash or modify it. If no timely challenge is filed, the provider has 10 days to produce the responsive information to Strike 3 Holdings.

The providers must preserve the subpoenaed information while it is being delivered or while a timely motion to quash is being resolved. Information disclosed in response to a subpoena may be used only to protect Strike 3 Holdings’ rights under the Copyright Act. Documents containing a current or proposed defendant’s name or other identifying information must be filed under seal, following the court’s local filing procedure.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.