Rose v. Kaveh
- Haywood Gilliam
- 4:20-cv-07461
- U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
- 1
In Rose v. Kaveh, Judge Gilliam granted the parties’ stipulated dismissal with prejudice and ordered the clerk to close the case.
Varda Rose, Marjan Kaveh, D.C., and Does 1 through 10; the action was dismissed with prejudice and ordered closed.
What happened
Varda Rose sued Marjan Kaveh, D.C., and Does 1 through 10 in Rose v. Kaveh. The opinion does not describe the claims or the underlying dispute.
The parties jointly agreed to dismiss the action with prejudice, meaning the case could not be brought again as dismissed.
Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. granted the dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 and directed the clerk to close the case.
The detailed version
- Rose v. Kaveh · No. 4:20-cv-07461
- Haywood Gilliam
- Dec. 28, 2020
Background
Varda Rose brought this action against Marjan Kaveh, D.C., and Does 1 through 10. The opinion does not state what claims Rose asserted or provide details about the underlying dispute.
Parties’ Agreement
The parties stipulated, or formally agreed, that the action should be dismissed with prejudice. A dismissal with prejudice bars the dismissed action from being brought again. The court cited Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(iii), which addresses stipulated dismissals.
Ruling
Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. granted the Joint Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice. The court directed the Clerk of Court to close the action. The opinion does not rule on the merits of any underlying claim.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.