Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 4, 2021

China Fortune Land Development v. 1955 Capital Fund I GP LLC

Judge
Vince Chhabria
Docket
3:19-cv-07043
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In China Fortune Land Development v. 1955 Capital Fund I GP LLC, Judge Chhabria denied vacatur, granted sealing motions, and granted a stipulation.

Who this affects

The plaintiffs and defendants in the case, and the filings addressed by the sealing motions and stipulation.

What happened

In China Fortune Land Development v. 1955 Capital Fund I GP LLC, the court ruled on a motion to vacate a judgment and motions concerning sealed filings.

The court denied the motion to vacate the judgment. It granted the motions to file documents under seal and granted a stipulation to remove one document from the docket.

Judge Vince Chhabria issued the order on January 4, 2021. The opinion does not explain the reasons for the rulings beyond citing Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 62.1(a)(2) and a prior appellate decision.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
China Fortune Land Development v. 1955 Capital Fund I GP LLC · No. 3:19-cv-07043
Judge
Vince Chhabria
Date
Jan. 4, 2021

Rulings

The court denied the motion to vacate the judgment, citing Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 62.1(a)(2) and Midland Innovations, NV v. Wang, 815 F. App’x 200 (9th Cir. 2020). The order does not provide further reasoning.

The court granted the motions to file documents under seal, referring to docket entries 84, 92, 99, and 101. It also granted the stipulation to remove the document filed at docket entry 84-9, referring to docket entry 91.

Effect

The judgment was not vacated. The specified sealing motions were granted, and the stipulation concerning docket entry 84-9 was granted. The order does not state any additional effect on the parties’ claims or defenses.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.