Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 26, 2021

Hufnus v. DoNotPay, Inc.

Judge
Vince Chhabria
Docket
3:20-cv-08701
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureClass Action
In one sentence

In Hufnus v. DoNotPay, Judge Chhabria granted DoNotPay’s motion to stay the case pending the Supreme Court’s decision in Facebook v. Duguid.

Who this affects

The stay affects Mathew Hufnus, the people he seeks to represent, and DoNotPay, Inc. by pausing the case until the specified Supreme Court decision.

What happened

Mathew Hufnus brought Hufnus v. DoNotPay, Inc. for himself and others similarly situated against DoNotPay, Inc.

DoNotPay asked the court to pause the case while the Supreme Court considered Facebook, Inc. v. Duguid. The court granted the motion and stayed the case pending that decision.

Judge Chhabria ordered the parties to promptly notify the court by letter when the Supreme Court issued its decision. The order does not describe the underlying claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Hufnus v. DoNotPay, Inc. · No. 3:20-cv-08701
Judge
Vince Chhabria
Date
Jan. 26, 2021

Background

Mathew Hufnus sued DoNotPay, Inc. individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated. DoNotPay moved to stay, meaning to pause, the case while the Supreme Court decided Facebook, Inc. v. Duguid, 141 S. Ct. 193 (2020). The order does not explain the claims or the legal issue that made the Supreme Court’s decision relevant.

Ruling

The court granted DoNotPay’s motion to stay. The case was stayed pending the Supreme Court’s decision in Facebook, Inc. v. Duguid. The parties were ordered to promptly advise the court by letter when the Supreme Court issued its decision.

Procedural note

The text states that the motion came on for hearing on February 25, 2021, but the order is dated January 26, 2021. The document is labeled a proposed order, while its operative text states that the motion is granted.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.