Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 19, 2021

Blanchard

Judge
Beth Freeman
Docket
5:20-cv-07578
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
4
HabeasCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Blanchard v. United States, Judge Freeman transferred Selena Blanchard’s federal custody petition because only her sentencing court could address her compassionate-release request.

Who this affects

Selena Blanchard’s request for compassionate release was transferred from the Northern District of California to the Middle District of Florida, the court where she was sentenced.

What happened

In Selena Blanchard v. United States, the court considered letters and a form petition from Blanchard, a federal prisoner at FCI Dublin, as a request for relief under the federal custody statute. She sought compassionate release because of concern about contracting COVID-19.

Blanchard had asked the Middle District of Florida, where she was sentenced, for help pursuing compassionate release, but she had not filed the required sentence-reduction motion there. The Northern District of California concluded that it could not grant compassionate release through this type of petition because it was not the sentencing court.

Judge Beth Labson Freeman transferred the entire case to the Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division, and directed the Clerk to terminate all pending motions. The court did not decide whether Blanchard should receive compassionate release.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Blanchard · No. 5:20-cv-07578
Judge
Beth Freeman
Date
Feb. 19, 2021

Background

Selena Blanchard, identified as a federal prisoner at the Federal Correctional Institution in Dublin, filed a letter that the court construed as an attempt to bring a federal custody petition. After receiving the filing fee, the court gave her another opportunity to submit a proper petition. She then filed another letter and a form petition, which the court treated as arising under 28 U.S.C. § 2241.

According to the filings, Blanchard was sentenced in the Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division, in 2013 to “192 months/5 years supervision.” During 2020, she sought appointment of counsel in that court to help pursue compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582. The Middle District of Florida denied that request because she had not actually filed a sentence-reduction motion. Blanchard also asked the warden at FCI Dublin for compassionate release because she was concerned about contracting COVID-19, but the warden denied the request.

Court’s Analysis

The court explained that a request for compassionate release under § 3582 must be addressed to the sentencing court. It concluded that a district court cannot reduce a federal prisoner’s sentence under § 3582 through a petition under § 2241 when that district court was not the sentencing court. Because Blanchard was sentenced in the Middle District of Florida, the Northern District of California lacked jurisdiction to hear her compassionate-release request.

Disposition

The court transferred the federal custody action to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division, under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a), in the interest of justice. It directed the Clerk to terminate all pending motions and transfer the entire file. The order did not decide whether Blanchard was entitled to compassionate release.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.