Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 1, 2021

Turner v. Paley

Judge
Edward Chen
Docket
3:21-cv-01525
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Turner v. Paley, Judge Peterson transferred the prisoner’s civil-rights case to the Northern District of California because the claims arose there.

Who this affects

Anthony D.L. Turner and the defendants are affected because the case will proceed in the Northern District of California rather than the Eastern District of California.

What happened

In Anthony D.L. Turner v. Maya Paley, et al., Turner, a state prisoner without a lawyer, filed a civil-rights case under a federal civil-rights law.

The court said Turner’s claims arose in Napa County, which is in the Northern District of California. Because the case was filed in the wrong district, the court transferred it to that district.

Judge Jeremy D. Peterson ordered the transfer. The order addressed the proper court location and did not decide the underlying claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Turner v. Paley · No. 3:21-cv-01525
Judge
Edward Chen
Date
Mar. 1, 2021

Background

Anthony D.L. Turner, a state prisoner proceeding without a lawyer, filed a civil-rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The opinion states that his claims arose in Napa County.

Venue analysis

The court applied the federal venue statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). That statute identifies the federal districts where a civil action may be filed, including a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claims occurred. The court determined that Napa County is in the Northern District of California and that the action therefore should have been filed there rather than in the Eastern District of California.

Disposition

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a), a federal court may transfer a case filed in the wrong district when doing so serves the interests of justice. The court ordered that the matter be transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The order resolved venue and did not rule on the merits of Turner’s civil-rights claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.