Bonilla v. Monterey County
- Phyllis Hamilton
- 4:21-cv-02929
- U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
- 2
In Bonilla v. Clay, Judge Hamilton dismissed multiple civil-rights cases with prejudice after ruling Bonilla could not proceed without paying fees.
Steven Wayne Bonilla and the defendants in the multiple listed civil-rights cases.
What happened
In Bonilla v. Judge Clarence Don Clay, et al., Steven Wayne Bonilla, a state prisoner, filed multiple self-represented civil-rights lawsuits under a federal law allowing claims against officials who violate constitutional rights. The defendants included various federal and state judges and a correctional officers’ union. The lawsuits sought relief related to Bonilla’s conviction and the handling of his other cases.
The court ruled that Bonilla was barred from proceeding without paying the filing fees because he had previously been disqualified from that status and had not shown that he faced an immediate danger of serious physical injury when he filed. The court also stated that, even if he had been allowed to proceed without paying fees, the lawsuits would be barred by other legal doctrines and precedents because they challenged his conviction or ongoing court proceedings.
The court dismissed the cases with prejudice, directed the clerk to terminate pending motions and close the cases, and ordered that future documents Bonilla submitted in those closed cases be returned without filing. Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton signed the order.
The detailed version
- Bonilla v. Monterey County · No. 4:21-cv-02929
- Phyllis Hamilton
- Apr. 29, 2021
Background
Steven Wayne Bonilla, identified as a state prisoner, filed multiple self-represented civil-rights complaints under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. That statute provides a federal cause of action for certain constitutional-rights violations by people acting under state law. The complaints named various federal and state judges and a correctional officers’ union as defendants. The court said the complaints presented very similar claims and sought relief concerning Bonilla’s underlying conviction or the way state and federal courts handled his other cases.
Proceeding Without Paying Filing Fees
Bonilla was disqualified from proceeding without paying the filing fee under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), unless he showed that he was in immediate danger of serious physical injury when he filed the complaints. The court found that the allegations did not show such danger. Accordingly, the court ruled that Bonilla could not proceed without paying the filing fees.
Other Grounds Identified by the Court
The court further stated that, even if an application to proceed without paying fees were granted, the lawsuits would be barred under the legal doctrines and precedents cited in the order, including doctrines concerning challenges to criminal convictions, interference with ongoing state proceedings, and claims against federal judges or courts. The opinion did not conduct a merits determination that Bonilla’s underlying conviction or the handling of his other cases was lawful.
Disposition
The court dismissed the cases with prejudice. It directed the clerk to terminate all pending motions and close the cases. It also directed the clerk to return, without filing, any further documents Bonilla submitted in the closed cases. The order was signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton.
Anonymization and Caption Note
The supplied case name identifies Monterey County, but the opinion’s caption names Judge Clarence Don Clay and other defendants. This summary follows the opinion’s caption.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.