Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled May 3, 2021

Solomon v. Google LLC

Judge
Edward Davila
Docket
5:21-cv-03227
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureCivil Rights
In one sentence

In Solomon v. Google LLC, Judge Cousins ordered Solomon to explain why the case should not be dismissed over incomplete diversity-jurisdiction allegations.

Who this affects

Judy Solomon, who was required to address whether the court had diversity jurisdiction; Google LLC was given a deadline to respond.

What happened

Solomon v. Google LLC began when Judy Solomon sued Google LLC and claimed the federal court had diversity jurisdiction, which generally requires qualifying citizenship differences between the parties.

The court said Solomon used the citizenship rules for corporations instead of the rules for limited liability companies. For an LLC, she needed to identify the citizenship of all its members and then assess whether diversity jurisdiction existed.

Judge Nathanael M. Cousins ordered Solomon to explain in writing by May 17, 2021, why the case should not be dismissed. Google’s response was due May 24, 2021. The order did not itself dismiss the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Solomon v. Google LLC · No. 5:21-cv-03227
Judge
Edward Davila
Date
May 3, 2021

Background

Judy Solomon filed a complaint against Google LLC. She alleged that the court had subject-matter jurisdiction based on diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d)(2). Diversity jurisdiction is a basis for federal jurisdiction that depends on the parties’ citizenship and other statutory requirements.

Jurisdictional issue

The court stated that Solomon incorrectly applied the citizenship test for a corporation to Google, which is a limited liability company. For diversity-jurisdiction purposes, the court explained, limited liability companies are treated like partnerships. Solomon therefore needed to identify the citizenship of all of Google’s members and then evaluate whether diversity jurisdiction existed.

Order

The court ordered Solomon to show cause—that is, to explain in writing—why the case should not be dismissed. Her written response was due May 17, 2021, and Google’s response was due May 24, 2021. The order did not dismiss the case. The order was signed by Nathanael M. Cousins, United States Magistrate Judge.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.