Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled May 25, 2021

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 24.5.198.67

Judge
Haywood Gilliam
Docket
4:21-cv-03464
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
3
DiscoveryCivil ProcedureIntellectual Property
In one sentence

In Strike 3 Holdings v. John Doe, Judge Gilliam allowed subpoenas to identify the subscriber linked to an internet address.

Who this affects

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC, John Doe Subscriber Assigned IP Address 24.5.198.67, Comcast Cable, and any other internet service provider identified in Comcast’s response.

What happened

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC sued John Doe Subscriber Assigned IP Address 24.5.198.67 and asked to subpoena Comcast before the parties’ required early case meeting. The opinion does not identify John Doe’s name or address.

The court found good cause to allow the subpoena. Strike 3 may ask Comcast for John Doe’s true name and address and may subpoena another internet provider identified by Comcast. If Comcast is a cable operator, it must notify the subscriber by sending a copy of the order. Strike 3 may use the information only to protect and enforce the rights described in its complaint.

Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. also ordered that any identifying information Comcast provides must remain confidential until John Doe has an opportunity to ask to proceed anonymously and the court rules on that request. The protection ends if no such request is filed within 30 days after the information is disclosed.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 24.5.198.67 · No. 4:21-cv-03464
Judge
Haywood Gilliam
Date
May 25, 2021

Background

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC asked for permission to serve a subpoena on Comcast Cable before the parties’ conference required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f). The subpoena sought the true name and address of the John Doe defendant associated with the internet protocol address listed in the complaint and case caption.

Ruling

The court granted the application after finding that Strike 3 had shown “good cause” to serve a third-party subpoena under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45. Strike 3 may serve Comcast with a subpoena seeking John Doe’s true name and address and must attach a copy of the order. It may also serve the same type of subpoena on another internet service provider identified in Comcast’s response.

If Comcast qualifies as a cable operator under 47 U.S.C. § 522(5), the order requires it to follow 47 U.S.C. § 551(c)(2)(B), which permits disclosure of personal identifying information under a court order when the subscriber is notified. Comcast may provide that notice by sending the defendant a copy of this order.

Strike 3 may use information obtained through the subpoena only to protect and enforce the rights described in its complaint. The court also issued a limited protective order under Rule 26(c). Any name or other identifying information disclosed to Strike 3 must be kept confidential and may not be made public until the defendant has had an opportunity to ask to proceed anonymously and the court has ruled on that request. The protective order expires if the defendant does not file that request within 30 days after the information is disclosed.

This order authorizes early discovery and protects the subscriber’s identifying information; it does not decide whether John Doe infringed Strike 3’s copyright.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.