Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled May 26, 2021

Calhoun v. Google LLC

Judge
Yvonne Rogers
Docket
4:20-cv-05146
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
2
DiscoveryCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Calhoun v. Google LLC, Judge Van Keulen granted Google's request to seal portions of a discovery-hearing transcript protecting confidential internal information.

Who this affects

Google LLC and the public's access to the specified portions of the April 29, 2021 discovery-hearing transcript.

What happened

Calhoun v. Google LLC involved Google's request to seal portions of the transcript from an April 29, 2021 discovery hearing. The parties submitted the request jointly.

The court applied the lower “good cause” standard because the transcript concerned a discovery-related motion rather than the merits of the case. It found that the requested redactions were narrowly tailored to protect confidential information about Google's internal systems, operations, identifiers, cookies, data logs, and links to users' Google Accounts.

The court granted the request as to the listed redacted portions of the transcript. Judge Susan Van Keulen signed the order on May 26, 2021.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Calhoun v. Google LLC · No. 4:20-cv-05146
Judge
Yvonne Rogers
Date
May 26, 2021

Background

The court considered the parties' joint submission concerning Google's request to seal portions of the transcript of an April 29, 2021 discovery hearing.

Legal standard

Court records are generally presumed to be accessible to the public. The court explained that the standard for sealing depends on how the records were used. Records related more than tangentially to the merits of a case require “compelling reasons” for secrecy. Records related only tangentially to the merits, including records submitted in connection with discovery matters, may be sealed upon a showing of “good cause” under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c). A party seeking to seal records must also follow the court's local procedures.

Ruling

The court held that the good-cause standard applied because the information was submitted in connection with a discovery-related motion rather than a motion concerning the merits of the case. It granted the request as to the specified redacted portions of the April 29, 2021 discovery-hearing transcript. The court found the redactions narrowly tailored to protect confidential information concerning Google's internal systems and operations, including the identifiers and cookies Google uses internally, the proprietary functions of those systems, the types of data logs Google maintains, and which logs are linked to a user's Google Account.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.