Strike 3 Holdings v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 69.215.150.143
- Joseph Spero
- 3:21-cv-03457
- U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
- 3
In Strike 3 Holdings v. John Doe, Judge Spero allowed early subpoenas to identify the internet subscriber linked to an IP address, with notice and challenge periods.
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC, the unidentified subscriber associated with IP address 69.215.150.143, AT&T U-verse, and any other internet service provider identified through the subpoenas.
What happened
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC asked the court for permission to subpoena AT&T U-verse before the parties held their required early case-management meeting. The subpoena sought the name and address of the person assigned IP address 69.215.150.143.
The court found good cause and allowed the subpoena. It also allowed subpoenas to other internet providers identified in the responses. The providers must notify affected subscribers, who may challenge or seek to change the subpoenas within 30 days.
Judge Joseph C. Spero ordered the providers to preserve the information, limited its use to protecting Strike 3 Holdings’ rights under the Copyright Act, and required identifying information to be filed under seal.
The detailed version
- Strike 3 Holdings v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 69.215.150.143 · No. 3:21-cv-03457
- Joseph Spero
- June 8, 2021
Background
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC requested permission to serve a third-party subpoena before the parties’ conference required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f). The requested subpoena was directed to AT&T U-verse and sought the true name and address of the defendant associated with IP address 69.215.150.143.
Ruling
The court found that Strike 3 Holdings had shown good cause to serve the subpoena. It granted permission to serve AT&T with a subpoena under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45, attaching a copy of the order. The court also authorized subpoenas to any other internet service provider identified in response to a subpoena as providing internet services to the defendant.
The court deemed the authorized subpoenas appropriate court orders under 47 U.S.C. § 551. Each provider has 30 days after service to give each affected subscriber a copy of the subpoena and the order. Each subscriber and provider then has 30 days after service to file a motion contesting the subpoena, including a motion to quash or modify it. If no timely challenge is filed, the provider has 10 days to produce the responsive information.
The order requires each provider to preserve the subpoenaed information until it delivers the information to Strike 3 Holdings or the court finally resolves a timely motion to quash. Information disclosed in response to a subpoena may be used only to protect Strike 3 Holdings’ rights under the Copyright Act. Any name or other personal identifying information of a current or proposed defendant must be filed under seal and not otherwise disclosed.
Effect of the Order
The order permits early discovery to identify the defendant, but it does not decide whether the defendant infringed copyright or resolve the underlying claims.
Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.