Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled July 26, 2021

Natural Grocers v. Perdue

Judge
James Donato
Docket
3:20-cv-05151
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
1
DiscoveryCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Natural Grocers v. Perdue, Judge Donato ordered the government to produce a privilege log by August 13, 2021.

Who this affects

The government defendants were required to produce the privilege log; the plaintiffs were affected because the log concerned documents withheld from production.

What happened

Natural Grocers and other plaintiffs disagreed with the government about whether a privilege log had to accompany the administrative record.

The government acknowledged that requiring such a log is the prevailing practice in the Northern District of California. The court directed the government to produce one that follows the court’s standing order for discovery in civil cases.

Judge James Donato issued the order on July 26, 2021, and set August 13, 2021, as the production deadline.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Natural Grocers v. Perdue · No. 3:20-cv-05151
Judge
James Donato
Date
July 26, 2021

Background

The parties disputed the government’s privilege log. A privilege log identifies documents withheld from production based on a claimed legal privilege and generally provides information sufficient to evaluate that claim. The government recognized that the Northern District of California generally requires a privilege log to be produced with the administrative record.

Order

The court directed the government to produce, by August 13, 2021, a privilege log conforming to the court’s Standing Order for Discovery in Civil Cases. The order cited the importance of access to relevant facts in promoting a fair search for the truth.

Disposition

Judge James Donato entered the privilege-log order. The excerpt does not state any other ruling on the parties’ claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.