Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 3, 2021

Sepulveda v. Reynoso

Judge
Alex Tse
Docket
3:21-cv-02950
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Sepulveda v. Reynoso, Judge Tse granted Sepulveda’s unopposed motion to add Itzel Reynoso as a defendant and ordered an amended complaint.

Who this affects

Richard Sepulveda may add Itzel Reynoso as a defendant and must file the first amended complaint by August 10, 2021; the court also canceled the scheduled hearing.

What happened

In Sepulveda v. Reynoso, Richard Sepulveda asked to amend his complaint to add Itzel Reynoso as a defendant. The opinion identifies Itzel Reynoso as the daughter of current defendant Martha Leticia Reynoso.

Martha Leticia Reynoso did not oppose the motion, and her deadline to respond had passed. The court found that justice would be served by allowing the proposed amendment.

Judge Alex Tse granted the motion, canceled the August 6, 2021 hearing, and ordered Sepulveda to file the amended complaint by August 10, 2021.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Sepulveda v. Reynoso · No. 3:21-cv-02950
Judge
Alex Tse
Date
Aug. 3, 2021

Background

Richard Sepulveda moved for permission to file a first amended complaint. He sought to add Itzel Reynoso, identified in the opinion as the daughter of current defendant Martha Leticia Reynoso, as a defendant.

Motion and ruling

Martha Leticia Reynoso did not oppose the motion, and her deadline to do so had passed. Applying Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2), which generally directs courts to freely allow amendments when justice requires, the court found that justice would be served by allowing the proposed amendment. Judge Alex Tse therefore granted Sepulveda’s unopposed motion.

The court vacated the hearing scheduled for August 6, 2021, and ordered Sepulveda to file the first amended complaint by August 10, 2021.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.