Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 23, 2021

Doe v. Life Insurance Company of North America

Judge
James Donato
Docket
3:21-cv-06279
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

Jane Doe v. Life Insurance Company of North America: Judge Tse temporarily allows Jane Doe to use a fictitious name, subject to later review.

Who this affects

Jane Doe may temporarily use a fictitious name in the lawsuit; the defendants may respond after they appear.

What happened

In Jane Doe v. Life Insurance Company of North America, Jane Doe asked to use a fictitious name because the matter involved sensitive and highly personal information. The defendants had not yet been served or appeared.

The court said the defendants’ potential unfairness had to be considered. For now, Jane Doe may proceed as Jane Doe and sign lawsuit documents using that name.

Jane Doe must notify the court again within 30 days after both defendants appear so they can respond, under an order signed by Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Doe v. Life Insurance Company of North America · No. 3:21-cv-06279
Judge
James Donato
Date
Aug. 23, 2021

Background

Jane Doe asked for permission to proceed under a fictitious name. Her motion stated that anonymity might be necessary to protect privacy in a sensitive and highly personal matter. The defendants had not yet been served and had not appeared in the case.

Court’s action

The court explained that it needed to consider the risk of unfairness to the defendants when evaluating the request. For now, the order permits Jane Doe to proceed under the name Jane Doe and to sign documents related to the lawsuit using that pseudonym.

The order also requires Jane Doe to re-notice her motion within 30 days after both defendants appear. At that point, the defendants may respond. The order does not state that the court permanently granted the request or otherwise resolve the motion after the defendants’ participation.

Result

The court issued the temporary permission described above and ordered Jane Doe to re-notice the motion after both defendants appear. The order was signed by Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.