Soukphrachanh v. Saul
- Maxine Chesney
- 3:20-cv-04547
- U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
- 2
In Soukphrachanh v. Kijakazi, Judge Chesney approved a $4,500 attorney-fee settlement under the Equal Access to Justice Act.
The order affects Lonnie Soukphrachanh, Bay Area Legal Aid, and the government. It approves payment of $4,500 in Equal Access to Justice Act attorney fees and $0 in costs, subject to any Treasury offset.
What happened
In Soukphrachanh v. Kijakazi, the parties agreed to settle the plaintiff’s request for attorney fees from the lawsuit. The agreement provided $4,500 in fees and no costs.
The government did not admit liability. Fees would be payable to the plaintiff, with possible direct payment to Bay Area Legal Aid if the Treasury Department found no federal debt requiring an offset.
Judge Chesney approved the parties’ stipulation on September 13, 2021. The payment resolved the claims for Equal Access to Justice Act fees in this action, while Bay Area Legal Aid waived any claim for additional fees under a separate Social Security law provision.
The detailed version
- Soukphrachanh v. Saul · No. 3:20-cv-04547
- Maxine Chesney
- Sept. 13, 2021
Background
Lonnie Soukphrachanh and the government submitted a stipulation resolving the plaintiff’s request for attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, a federal law that can allow a qualifying party to recover fees from the government. The stipulation stated that the plaintiff would receive $4,500 in attorney fees and $0 in costs.
The document identified Kilolo Kijakazi as the Acting Commissioner of Social Security and stated that she should replace Andrew Saul as the defendant under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(d). The provided case caption is therefore Soukphrachanh v. Kijakazi, although the supplied case name refers to Saul.
Agreement
The $4,500 represented compensation for all legal services performed for the plaintiff in connection with this civil action. The agreement stated that it was a compromise settlement and did not admit government liability under the Equal Access to Justice Act.
The fees were to be made payable to the plaintiff. After the fee order, the government would determine whether the fees were subject to an offset through the Treasury Department’s Offset Program. If the plaintiff did not owe a federal debt, the government would make payment directly to Bay Area Legal Aid under the plaintiff’s assignment of the fees. Payment would release and bar further claims by the plaintiff or counsel concerning Equal Access to Justice Act fees in this action. Bay Area Legal Aid waived its right to seek fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), although the stipulation stated that the settlement did not otherwise affect counsel’s rights under that provision.
Ruling
The court approved the parties’ stipulation and ordered the agreed settlement. The order awarded $4,500 in attorney fees and $0 in costs under the terms presented. It did not decide the underlying Social Security dispute in this document.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.