Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 13, 2021

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 99.16.100.105

Judge
Susan Illston
Docket
3:21-cv-07769
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
2
DiscoveryCivil ProcedureIntellectual Property
In one sentence

In Strike 3 Holdings v. John Doe, Judge Illston allowed early discovery from AT&T U-Verse to identify the anonymous defendant.

Who this affects

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC may seek John Doe’s identifying information from AT&T U-Verse. John Doe may challenge the subpoena, and AT&T U-Verse must provide notice and preserve the requested information as the order requires.

What happened

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC sued John Doe, identified by an internet address, and asked to subpoena AT&T U-Verse before the parties’ required early case-planning meeting.

The court found good cause for the request and allowed Strike 3 to use a subpoena to obtain the defendant’s true name and address. The order required AT&T U-Verse to notify John Doe and allowed John Doe time to challenge the subpoena.

Judge Susan Illston granted the application and imposed limits on notice, preservation of information, use of disclosed information, and service of the lawsuit. The order did not decide the underlying copyright dispute.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 99.16.100.105 · No. 3:21-cv-07769
Judge
Susan Illston
Date
Oct. 13, 2021

Background

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC asked for permission to serve a third-party subpoena before the parties held the conference required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f). The defendant was identified in the caption as John Doe Subscriber Assigned IP Address 99.16.100.105. Strike 3 sought information from AT&T U-Verse, identified in the order as the internet service provider, to learn the defendant’s true name and address.

Court’s Ruling

The court found that Strike 3 had shown good cause and granted its ex parte application. An ex parte application is a request decided without the opposing party’s participation at that stage. The court authorized Strike 3 to serve AT&T U-Verse with a Rule 45 subpoena, attaching a copy of the order, seeking the name and address of the person assigned the IP address listed in Exhibit A to the complaint.

Notice and Challenges

AT&T U-Verse must serve John Doe with the subpoena and the order within 20 days after being served. John Doe then has 30 days after receiving notice to file a motion contesting the subpoena, including a motion to quash or modify it. If that period expires without a challenge, AT&T U-Verse has 14 days to provide the information. The subpoenaed entity must preserve the subpoenaed information while the process is pending and until the information is delivered or a timely motion to quash is finally resolved.

Limits and Further Procedure

Any information disclosed may be used only to protect Strike 3’s rights under the Copyright Act. Strike 3 must serve John Doe with the summons, complaint, and other documents required by the court’s local rule within 120 days after learning John Doe’s identity. If the case continues after service, the parties must discuss whether a protective order is appropriate. The order addressed early discovery only; it did not decide whether John Doe infringed copyright or resolve the lawsuit’s merits.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.