Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 19, 2021

Whitaker v. Sifflet

Judge
Vince Chhabria
Docket
3:21-cv-03144
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureADA / DisabilityFee Petition
In one sentence

In Whitaker v. Sifflet, Judge Chhabria entered default judgment, awarding $6,472 and ordering wheelchair-accessible dining surfaces.

Who this affects

Brian Whitaker received a monetary judgment and injunctive relief. David Sifflet was ordered to provide wheelchair-accessible dining surfaces at the specified Behind the Bun restaurant.

What happened

In Whitaker v. Sifflet, Brian Whitaker moved for default judgment against David Sifflet. The court found that it had authority over the defendant and the case, and that Whitaker had the right to sue.

The court concluded that the complaint adequately alleged violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act and its regulations. It also concluded that an ADA violation automatically violates California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act, and that the defendant had been properly served.

Judge Vince Chhabria granted the motion for default judgment. He awarded Whitaker $1,635 in attorney’s fees, $837 in costs, and $4,000 in statutory damages, for a total monetary judgment of $6,472. The defendant was also ordered to provide wheelchair-accessible dining surfaces at the Behind the Bun restaurant in Oakland, California.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Whitaker v. Sifflet · No. 3:21-cv-03144
Judge
Vince Chhabria
Date
Oct. 19, 2021

Background

Brian Whitaker moved for default judgment against David Sifflet. The opinion states that Whitaker’s complaint adequately alleged violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and its implementing regulations. It also states that an ADA violation automatically constitutes a violation of California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act.

Court’s analysis

The court found that it had personal jurisdiction over the defendant, meaning authority over the defendant, and subject-matter jurisdiction, meaning authority to decide the type of dispute. It also found that the defendant was properly sued, that Whitaker had standing to sue, and that the defendant was properly served.

The court applied the factors identified in Eitel v. McCool for deciding whether to enter default judgment and concluded that those factors favored judgment for Whitaker.

Ruling and relief

The court granted Whitaker’s motion for default judgment. It awarded $1,635 in attorney’s fees and $837 in costs under the ADA and the Unruh Act. It also awarded $4,000 in statutory damages under the Unruh Act, for a total monetary judgment of $6,472.

The court further ordered the defendant to provide wheelchair-accessible dining surfaces at the “Behind the Bun” restaurant located at 4920 Telegraph Ave., Oakland, California, in compliance with the ADA. Judge Vince Chhabria signed the order on October 19, 2021.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.