Whitaker v. QIA SR San Francisco Operating LLC
- Donna Ryu
- 4:21-cv-00627
- U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
- 2
In Whitaker v. QIA SR San Francisco Operating LLC, Judge Ryu administratively closed the ADA case pending Ninth Circuit guidance on lodging-reservation regulations.
Brian Whitaker and QIA SR San Francisco Operating LLC; the case is paused while the Ninth Circuit considers related appeals.
What happened
Brian Whitaker sued QIA SR San Francisco Operating LLC, alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act and California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act. The defendant’s motion to dismiss was pending.
The dispute concerns federal regulations governing lodging-facility reservation systems. Because two related appeals could provide guidance on that issue, the court decided to pause this case.
Judge Donna M. Ryu ordered the case administratively closed rather than formally stayed. Any party may reopen it by filing a notice within 14 days after the Ninth Circuit issues its first formal order ending one of the specified appeals or another pending appeal interpreting the reservation regulations.
The detailed version
- Whitaker v. QIA SR San Francisco Operating LLC · No. 4:21-cv-00627
- Donna Ryu
- Oct. 20, 2021
Background
Brian Whitaker alleged that QIA SR San Francisco Operating LLC violated the Americans with Disabilities Act and California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act. The case concerns the scope of federal regulations governing reservation systems for lodging facilities, which the court called the “Reservations Rule.” The defendant had filed a motion to dismiss, and that motion remained pending.
The Ninth Circuit had not yet interpreted the Reservations Rule. Appeals in two related cases raised the same issues as Whitaker’s complaint. The court had therefore ordered the parties to explain why this case should not be paused while the Ninth Circuit considered those appeals. The opinion states that pausing the case would allow the court to receive guidance that could materially affect its decision and would conserve court and party resources.
Ruling
Judge Donna M. Ryu ordered the case administratively closed for docketing purposes instead of imposing a formal stay. The order did not decide the pending motion to dismiss or the merits of Whitaker’s claims. Any party may reopen the case by filing a notice within 14 days after the Ninth Circuit issues its first mandate in either specified appeal, or in another currently pending Ninth Circuit appeal interpreting the Reservations Rule.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.