Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 20, 2021

Viavi Solutions Inc. v. Platinum Optics Technology Inc.

Judge
Edward Davila
Docket
5:20-cv-05501
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
3
Civil ProcedureIntellectual Property
In one sentence

In Viavi Solutions v. Platinum Optics, Judge Davila granted Viavi’s motion to seal documents containing confidential business information.

Who this affects

Viavi Solutions Inc., whose confidential business information was ordered sealed, and anyone seeking access to the identified court filings.

What happened

In Viavi Solutions Inc. v. Platinum Optics Technology Inc., Viavi asked the court to seal documents containing confidential and proprietary business information. The motion arose in connection with a filing about lifting a stay after denial of inter partes review institutions.

The court granted the motion. It found that disclosure could harm Viavi because competitors could use the information to gain a marketplace advantage. The order required the identified agreements and business documents, including Exhibits 3 through 7 to the Hector declaration, to be filed under seal.

Judge Edward J. Davila signed the order on October 20, 2021. The opinion excerpt does not clearly show the full scope of the materials listed under the separate “Lift Stay” entry.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Viavi Solutions Inc. v. Platinum Optics Technology Inc. · No. 5:20-cv-05501
Judge
Edward Davila
Date
Oct. 20, 2021

Background

Viavi Solutions Inc. filed an administrative motion to seal. The motion concerned documents submitted in connection with a motion to lift a stay following denial of inter partes review institutions. The court considered Viavi’s motion, the documents proposed for sealing, the parties’ arguments and written submissions, applicable law, and the case record.

Court’s reasoning

The court applied the “compelling reasons” standard for sealing court records. It found that the documents contained confidential and proprietary business information and that disclosure could create a risk of injury because competitors could use the information to gain a competitive advantage in the marketplace.

Ruling

The court granted Viavi’s motion to seal. It ordered the following documents to be filed under seal in their entirety:

- Hector Declaration, Exhibit 3, described as a Viavi agreement; - Hector Declaration, Exhibit 4, described as a Viavi agreement; - Hector Declaration, Exhibit 5, described as a Viavi business document; - Hector Declaration, Exhibit 6, described as a Viavi agreement; and - Hector Declaration, Exhibit 7, described as a Viavi business document.

The order states that these materials contain confidential information about Viavi’s business strategy and relationships with third parties. The table also contains a separate “Lift Stay” entry referring to the parties and their confidential business information, but the excerpt’s formatting does not clearly identify the full scope of the materials covered by that entry.

Effect of the order

The order addressed only the sealing request. It did not decide the underlying dispute between Viavi Solutions Inc. and Platinum Optics Technology Inc. The order was signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on October 20, 2021.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.