Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 26, 2021

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 24.5.48.227

Judge
Virginia Demarchi
Docket
5:21-cv-07997
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
2
DiscoveryCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Strike 3 Holdings v. John Doe, Judge Demarchi allowed a subpoena to identify the internet subscriber before the parties’ required conference.

Who this affects

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC may serve Comcast Cable with a subpoena for the subscriber’s identity. Comcast and the unidentified subscriber receive notice and protections under the order.

What happened

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC asked to subpoena Comcast Cable for the name and address of the subscriber assigned IP address 24.5.48.227, before the parties held their required conference about managing the case. The court found good cause for early discovery.

The court granted Strike 3 Holdings, LLC’s request. It allowed the company to serve Comcast with a subpoena seeking the subscriber’s true name and address, but the subpoena had to include the court’s order. Comcast had to notify the subscriber, who could object or seek a protective order.

The information could be used only to protect and enforce Strike 3’s rights described in its complaint, and it could not be publicly disclosed without the subscriber’s consent or the court’s permission. Judge Demarchi issued the order on October 26, 2021.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 24.5.48.227 · No. 5:21-cv-07997
Judge
Virginia Demarchi
Date
Oct. 26, 2021

Background

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC sought permission to serve Comcast Cable, the internet service provider associated with the subscriber assigned IP address 24.5.48.227, with a subpoena before the parties’ Rule 26(f) conference. The subpoena sought the subscriber’s true name and address.

Court’s analysis

The court found good cause for the early discovery. It concluded that Strike 3 had shown that: (1) it identified the defendant specifically enough for the court to determine that the defendant was a real person or entity who could be sued in federal court; (2) it had taken earlier steps to locate the defendant; (3) its action could withstand a motion to dismiss; and (4) discovery was reasonably likely to identify the defendant so that service of process could occur.

The court also noted that, after learning the defendant’s identity, Strike 3 could not rely only on an allegation that the person was the subscriber assigned to an IP address associated with infringing activity to state a plausible direct claim. At this stage, however, the court concluded that limited discovery to determine the defendant’s identity was proper.

Order

The court granted Strike 3’s application. Strike 3 may serve Comcast with a Rule 45 subpoena requiring Comcast to provide the subscriber’s true name and address, and it must attach the order to the subpoena. Comcast must provide the subscriber with copies of the subpoena and order within 30 days after the subpoena is served on Comcast. Comcast may use reasonable means to provide that notice.

Strike 3 may use information produced in response to the subpoena only to protect and enforce the rights described in its complaint. Comcast may object to the subpoena and may seek a protective order. If Comcast provides subscriber-identifying information, Strike 3 may not publicly disclose it without the subscriber’s consent or permission from the court. Judge Virginia K. Demarchi signed the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.