Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 3, 2021

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 98.207.4.230

Judge
Joseph Spero
Docket
3:21-cv-07996
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
3
DiscoveryIntellectual PropertyCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Strike 3 Holdings v. John Doe, Judge Spero granted an application allowing subpoenas to identify the subscriber linked to an Internet address.

Who this affects

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC may seek identifying information from Comcast and other identified Internet service providers. The subscriber linked to Internet Protocol address 98.207.4.230, and any other affected subscribers, must receive notice and may challenge the subpoenas within the specified period. The providers must preserve the information and may have to produce it if no timely challenge is filed.

What happened

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC asked the court for permission to subpoena Comcast before the parties held their required early case-planning meeting. It said the subpoena would identify the person assigned Internet Protocol address 98.207.4.230.

The court found good cause and allowed Strike 3 Holdings to serve Comcast with a subpoena seeking the defendant’s true name and address. The order also allowed subpoenas to other Internet providers identified through that process.

Judge Spero required the providers to notify affected subscribers, gave subscribers and providers 30 days to challenge a subpoena, and limited use of disclosed information to protecting rights under the Copyright Act. The court also required personal identifying information to be filed under seal.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 98.207.4.230 · No. 3:21-cv-07996
Judge
Joseph Spero
Date
Nov. 3, 2021

Background

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC asked for permission to serve a third-party subpoena before the parties’ conference required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f). The subpoena sought information from Comcast Cable about the person to whom Comcast assigned Internet Protocol address 98.207.4.230.

Ruling

The court found that Strike 3 Holdings had shown “good cause” to obtain the information. It granted the ex parte application and authorized Strike 3 Holdings to serve Comcast with a Rule 45 subpoena—a subpoena requiring a nonparty to provide information—seeking the defendant’s true name and address. The subpoena must include a copy of the order.

The court also authorized Strike 3 Holdings to serve the same type of subpoena on any other Internet service provider identified in response to a subpoena as providing Internet service to the defendant. The order treated the authorized subpoenas as court orders permitting disclosure under 47 U.S.C. § 551, subject to the statute’s notice requirement.

Notice, challenges, and limits

Each Internet service provider must serve the affected subscriber with the subpoena and the order within 30 days after being served. The subscriber or provider then has 30 days after service to file a motion challenging the subpoena, including a motion to quash or modify it. If no timely challenge is filed, the provider has 10 days to produce the responsive information. Providers must preserve the subpoenaed information while awaiting production or resolution of a timely challenge.

Any information disclosed may be used only to protect Strike 3 Holdings’ rights under the Copyright Act. The order also requires the names and other personal identifying information of current or proposed defendants to be filed under seal and not otherwise disclosed.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.